Topical application of 5-aminolevulinic acid, DMSO and EDTA: protoporphyrin IX accumulation in skin and tumours of mice
Abstract
Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) application in three different creams was carried out on mice bearing subcutaneously transplanted C26 colon carcinoma. The creams contained (a) 20% ALA alone, (b) ALA with 2% dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO) and (c) ALA, DMSO and 2% edetic acid disodium salt (EDTA). Protoporphyrin IX (PP) production in the tumour and in the skin overlying the tumour was studied by two methods: laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) and chemical extraction. The kinetics of PP production in the skin and in the tumour, as studied by the LIF method, was similar for all three cream preparations. The PP fluorescence intensity in the tissues reached its maximum 4-6 h after application of the creams. Quantitative analysis showed that the PP concentration after treatment was more pronounced in the skin than in the tumour. The efficiency of porphyrin production in the skin by the creams used was in the following order: ALA-DMSO-EDTA > ALA-DMSO > ALA. In the tumour the enhancing effect of DMSO and EDTA on PP accumulation induced by ALA was observed mainly in the upper 2 mm section. However, the concentration of PP in the tumour was found to be approximately the same for ALA-DMSO and ALA-DMSO-EDTA cream combinations. The possible mechanisms of the effect of DMSO and EDTA are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
EDTA does not increase PpIX production in a mouse tumor model and BCC patients after ALA administration, and DFO does not enhance PpIX fluorescence in skin cancer patients.
“Despite these promising results from many in vitro studies, EDTA does not increase PpIX production in a mouse tumor model [102] and BCC patients [103] after ALA administration, and DFO does not enhance PpIX fluorescence in skin cancer patients either [104].”
From 5-Aminolevulinic Acid as a Theranostic Agent for Tumor Fluorescence Imaging and Photodynamic Therapy (2023) · cites this paper as [102]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 138
- Authors
- Malik, Z., Kostenich, G., Roitman, L., Ehrenberg, B., & Orenstein, A.
- Affiliations
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- Sheba Medical Center (IL)
- Corresponding author
- Malik, Z.
- ORCID
- Malik, Z.
- Venue
- Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-06
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 213-218
- ISSN
- 1011-1344 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076565678
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 7.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Photodynamic Therapy Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Porphyrin Metabolism and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Studies
- Keywords
- 5-aminolevulinic acid, topical application, dimethyl sulfoxide, EDTA, protoporphyrin IX, porphyrin accumulation, C26 colon carcinoma, laser-induced fluorescence, skin tumours, photosensitizers, topical cream formulation
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Topical, Aminolevulinic Acid, Animals, Colonic Neoplasms, Dimethyl Sulfoxide, Edetic Acid, Female, Kinetics, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Protoporphyrins, Skin, Spectrometry, Fluorescence, Time Factors, Mice
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review