Quantum Mechanics: Generalizations
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Pilot-wave theory has its own ('subquantum') theory of measurement.
“the theory has its own ('subquantum') theory of measurement”
From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Pearle and Valentini 2006
The wider physics of nonequilibrium has its own theory of measurement 'subquantum measurement'.
“The wider physics of nonequilibrium has its own theory of measurement 'subquantum measurement'”
From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Pearle and Valentini 2006
This is possible if the experimenter possesses an apparatus whose 'pointer' has an arbitrarily narrow nonequilibrium distribution.
“This is possible if the experimenter possesses an apparatus whose 'pointer' has an arbitrarily narrow nonequilibrium distribution”
From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Pearle and Valentini 2006
A sequence of such operations allows the experimenter to determine the system trajectory without disturbing the wave function, to arbitrary accuracy.
“A sequence of such operations allows the experimenter to determine the system trajectory without disturbing the wave function, to arbitrary accuracy.”
From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Pearle and Valentini 2006
In pilot-wave theory, an 'ideal subquantum measurement' enables an experimenter to measure a de Broglie-Bohm system trajectory without disturbing the wave function.
“an 'ideal subquantum measurement' (analogous to the ideal, non-disturbing measurement familiar from classical physics) enables an experimenter to measure a de Broglie-Bohm system trajectory without disturbing the wave function.”
From De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial? (2008) · cites this paper as Pearle and Valentini 2006
Cites
Derivation of the Schrödinger Equation from Newtonian Mechanics
Nelson, E. (1966) · Physical Review · doi:10.1103/physrev.150.1079 · Cited by 1,725 · see citing works
Dynamical origin of quantum probabilities
Valentini, A., & Westman, H. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2004.1394 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Self-citationSubquantum information and computation
Valentini, A. (2002) · Pramana · doi:10.1007/s12043-002-0117-1 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
De Broglie-Bohm Pilot-Wave Theory: Many Worlds in Denial?
Valentini, A. (2008) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0811.0810
“…a ‘quantum nonequilibrium’ distribution P (q, 0) 6= |Ψ(q, 0)|2 , (5) in general one obtains a distribution of final outcomes that disagrees with quantum theory (for as long as P has not yet relaxed to |Ψ|2, see below) (Valentini 1991a,b, 1992, 1996, 2001, 2002, 2004a; Pearle and Valentini 2006).”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Pearle, P., & Valentini, A.
- Affiliations
- Hamilton College (US)
- Perimeter Institute (CA)
- Venue
- Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 265-276
- OpenAlex
- W3023861661
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- Type
- reference entry
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
- Keywords
- quantum mechanics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
