The Role of Discrepancy-Associated Affect in Prejudice Reduction
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Techniques that lead people to recognize their unconscious biases include exercises where they compare what they would do and what they should do in intergroup circumstances, and procedures such as the Implicit Association Test that can reveal unconscious prejudice and stereotypes.
“Techniques that lead people to recognize their unconscious biases include exercises where they are prompted to compare what they would do and what they should do in a variety of intergroup circumstances,45 and recently developed procedures (such as the Implicit Association Test52,53) that can reveal unconscious prejudice and stereotypes.”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [45]
Unconscious biases are habits of mind, learned over time through repeated personal experiences and cultural socialization, and are highly resistant to change.
“as unconscious biases are “habits of mind”,31,45 learned over time through repeated personal experiences and cultural socialization, they are highly resistant to change.46”
From Reducing Racial Bias Among Health Care Providers: Lessons from Social-Cognitive Psychology (2007) · cites this paper as [45]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 212
- Authors
- DEVINE, P. G., & MONTEITH, M. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 317-344
- OpenAlex
- W2484811517
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 41.20
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Keywords
- prejudice reduction, affect, stereotype threat, value internalization, self-regulation, intergroup attitudes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
