REASONING FROM INCOMPLETE KNOWLEDGE
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
AI in CAI: An Artificial-Intelligence Approach to Computer-Assisted Instruction
Carbonell, J. (1970) · IEEE Transactions on Man Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/tmms.1970.299942 · Cited by 955 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4 · Cited by 2,552 · see citing works
Inductive judgments about natural categories
Rips, L. J. (1975) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(75)80055-7 · Cited by 465 · see citing works
- Authors
- Collins, A., Warnock, E. H., Aiello, N., & Miller, M. L.
- ORCID
- Miller, Mark L.
- Venue
- Representation and Understanding
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1975
- Pages
- 383-415
- OpenAlex
- W1567648988
- Cited by
- 163
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 12.16
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
- Keywords
- incomplete knowledge, uncertainty reasoning, data inconsistency, scholars, semantic networks, human memory, implicit and explicit knowledge, expert systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review