Cited by 78Blood properties and coagulationNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Local Regulation of Microvascular Perfusion

Davis, Michael J, Hill, Michael A, Kuo, Lih·2008·Microcirculation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-374530-9.00006-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 0.05-0.2 Hz band corresponds to the established frequency range of spontaneous vessel diameter oscillations (vasomotion) reported in rodents.

    “Importantly, the 0.05–0.2 Hz band corresponds to the established frequency range of spontaneous vessel diameter oscillations (vasomotion) reported in rodents2,43.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 1,362 · Cited by 78

Authors
Davis, M. J., Hill, M. A., & Kuo, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Missouri (US)
  • Texas A&M Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Microcirculation
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2008
Pages
161-284
OpenAlex
W4211014693
Cited by
78
References
1,362
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.16
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Blood properties and coagulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
tissue blood flow, reactive hyperemia, functional hyperemia, myogenic control, metabolic control, flow-mediated dilation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review