The Retrograde Response
Open accessAbstract
The retrograde response was discovered in Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a signaling pathway from the mitochondrion to the nucleus that triggers an array of gene regulatory changes in the latter. The activation of the retrograde response compensates for the deficits associated with aging, and thus it extends yeast replicative life span. The retrograde response is activated by the progressive decline in mitochondrial membrane potential during aging that is the result of increasing mitochondrial dysfunction. The ensuing metabolic adaptations and stress resistance can only delay the inevitable demise of the yeast cell. The retrograde response is embedded in a network of signal transduction pathways that impinge upon virtually every aspect of cell physiology. Thus, its manifestations are complicated. Many of these pathways have been implicated in life span regulation quite independently of the retrograde response. Together, they operate in a delicate balance in promoting longevity. The retrograde response is closely aligned with cell quality control, often performing when quality control is not sufficient to assure longevity. Among the key pathways related to this aspect of retrograde signaling are target of rapamycin and ceramide signaling. The retrograde response can also be found in other organisms, including Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, mouse, and human, where it exhibits an ever-increasing complexity that may be corralled by the transcription factor NFκB. The retrograde response may have evolved as a cytoprotective mechanism that senses and defends the organism from pathogens and environmental toxins.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MITF is not involved in mitonuclear signaling.
“The human homolog of Rtg3p is the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) (Goding and Arnheiter 2019), which is not involved in mitonuclear signaling that in Metazoa evolved independently and uses different mechanisms (Butow and Avadhani 2004; Jazwinski 2014; English et al. 2020).”
From Mitochondrial retrograde control of transcription evolves with respiratory stress, metabolic adaptation, and virulence in budding yeasts (2026) · cites this paper as Jazwinski 2014
The 'Retrograde response in other organisms' section describes calcium, NFκB, and Myc in mammalian mitochondria-to-nucleus signaling, supporting the point that its described mechanisms differ from the yeast Rtg pathway. It does not say MITF is uninvolved or that metazoan signaling evolved independently; those parts of the attributed claim are unsupported by this copy. The passages have no page numbers. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredMetazoan mitonuclear signaling evolved independently and uses different mechanisms.
“The human homolog of Rtg3p is the microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) (Goding and Arnheiter 2019), which is not involved in mitonuclear signaling that in Metazoa evolved independently and uses different mechanisms (Butow and Avadhani 2004; Jazwinski 2014; English et al. 2020).”
From Mitochondrial retrograde control of transcription evolves with respiratory stress, metabolic adaptation, and virulence in budding yeasts (2026) · cites this paper as Jazwinski 2014
The Introduction and “Retrograde response in other organisms” describe variations in mitochondria-to-nucleus signaling across organisms, including calcium and NFκB signaling in human cells. But the paper does not say metazoan signaling evolved independently; it instead describes the response as operating across organisms and identifies mammalian Myc-Max as homologous to yeast Rtg1-Rtg3. The different-mechanisms portion is supported, but the independent-evolution portion is not. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 130 · Cited by 67
- Authors
- Jazwinski, S. M.
- Affiliations
- Tulane University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Jazwinski, S. Michal
- Venue
- Progress in molecular biology and translational science
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 127
- Pages
- 133-154
- ISSN
- 1877-1173 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4271643
- OpenAlex
- W2307142541
- Cited by
- 67
- References
- 130
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 5.09
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Progress in molecular biology and translational science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG017887, R37AG006168)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Mitochondrial Function and Pathology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Keywords
- retrograde response, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, replicative lifespan, aging, mitochondrial dysfunction, mitochondrial membrane potential, stress tolerance, metabolic adaptation, ceramide signaling, cell quality control, NF-κB, longevity, cytoprotection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Signal Transduction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review