The role of Puget Sound and Washington coastal estuaries in the life history of Pacific salmon: an unappreciated function.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a more estuary-dependent species, juvenile Chinook are especially susceptible to estuarine modifications.
“As a more estuary-dependent species, juvenile Chinook are especially susceptible to estuarine modifications [1,3].”
From Subyearling Chinook salmon diets in Lower Columbia River estuarine habitats (2025) · cites this paper as [3]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 24 · Cited by 231
- Authors
- Simenstad, C. A., Fresh, K. L., & Salo, E. O.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Estuarine Comparisons
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1982
- Pages
- 343-364
- OpenAlex
- W2220090567
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.49
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Aquatic Science › Fish Biology and Ecology Studies
- Keywords
- Pacific salmon, estuaries, Puget Sound, salmon life history, chum salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, estuary management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
