The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Semi-Structured Interviews
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Semi-structured interviews let participants raise additional information that was not identified beforehand (Wilson, 2014).”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Wilson, 2014
In the citing paper
“This qualitative approach is appropriate to gather opinions on a topic that is still partly unknown (Wilson, 2014)”
From Exploring the role of generative AI in higher education: Semi-structured interviews with students with disabilities (2025) · cites this paper as Wilson, 2014
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Qualitative research: deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis
Azungah, T. (2018) · Qualitative Research Journal · doi:10.1108/qrj-d-18-00035 · Cited by 1,262
Diagnostic uncertainty in youth with chronic pain and their parents
Neville, A., Jordan, A., Beveridge, J. K., Pincus, T., & Noel, M. (2019) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2019.03.004 · Cited by 124
Pierrès, O., Darvishy, A., & Christen, M. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13134-8 · Cited by 48
The REFReSH study group, Drew, S., Judge, A., May, C., Farmer, A., Cooper, C., Javaid, M. K., & Gooberman-Hill, R. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0243-z · Cited by 43
Supporting Learners in a Crisis Context with Smart Self-Assessment
Papamitsiou, Z., Lunde, M., Westermoen, J., & Giannakos, M. N. (2021) · Lecture Notes in Educational Technology · doi:10.1007/978-981-15-7869-4_14 · Cited by 9
Abel, E. E. D. H., Cup, E. H. C., Lanser, A., Leclercq, W. K. G., Raaphorst, J., Padberg, G. W., Satink, T., & Voermans, N. C. (2018) · Neuromuscular Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.nmd.2018.09.003 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, C.
- Corresponding author
- Wilson, Chauncey
- Venue
- Interview Techniques for UX Practitioners
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2014
- Pages
- 23-41
- OpenAlex
- W161730182
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 25
- FWCI
- 202.55
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Keywords
- semi-structured interviews, structured interviews, interview planning, data reliability, probes, qualitative data collection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
