Endocrinology Alfresco: Psychoendocrine Studies of Wild Baboons
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Plasma glucocorticoid levels across vertebrates are higher in dominant animals during periods of particularly intense competitive interactions between dominant animals such as during high reproductive competition or food shortage.
“studies that have demonstrated that plasma glucocorticoid levels across vertebrates are higher in dominant animals during periods of particularly intense competitive interactions between dominant animals such as during high reproductive competition or food shortage [7,38–43].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 258
- Authors
- SAPOLSKY, R. M.
- Affiliations
- Institute of Primate Research (KE)
- Corresponding author
- SAPOLSKY, ROBERT M.
- ORCID
- SAPOLSKY, ROBERT M.
- Venue
- Recent Progress in Hormone Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1993
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 437-468
- OpenAlex
- W2150329869
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 5.75
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- McGill University
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- cortisol hypersecretion, social subordination, baboons, stress, adrenocortical function, social rank
- MeSH terms
- Adrenal Cortex, Animals, Endocrine Glands, Male, Papio, Social Dominance, Testis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
