CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 107Pleistocene-Era Hominins and ArchaeologyArchaeological and Geological StudiesArchaeology and ancient environmental studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Upper Paleolithic Sites on the Central Russian Plain

Soffer, Olga·1985·The Upper Paleolithic of the Central Russian Plain
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-654270-7.50010-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-654270-7.50010-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 107

Metadata

Authors
Soffer, O.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Corresponding author
Soffer, Olga
Venue
The Upper Paleolithic of the Central Russian Plain
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1985
Pages
18-143
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-654270-7.50010-0
OpenAlex
W2484190478
Cited by
107
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
59.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Archeology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
Keywords
Upper Palaeolithic, archaeological site, prehistoric settlement, Stone Age

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review