Cited by 12Behavioral and Psychological StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild Nutrition and Feeding Issues

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 83 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional analysis methodology in developmental disabilities

Peters-Scheffer, Nienke, Didden, Robert·2020·Functional Analysis in Clinical Treatment

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-805469-7.00004-8

Cites

83 of 83 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Peters-Scheffer, N., & Didden, R.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Functional Analysis in Clinical Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2020
Pages
75-95
OpenAlex
W3191596000
Cited by
12
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
3.52
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
Keywords
functional analysis, developmental disabilities, autism spectrum disorder, behavioral problems, function-based treatment, adaptive skills, clinical practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review