The temporal dynamics of the wish to live and the wish to die among suicidal individuals
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The FVT is the only model following an ideation-to-action framework which fully considers the role of ambivalence.
“The FVT is the only model following an ideation-to-action framework which fully considers the role of ambivalence (Bryan, 2020).”
From The Psychological Pathway to Suicide Attempts: A Strategy of Control Without Awareness (2021) · cites this paper as Bryan, 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 13
- Authors
- Bryan, C. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bryan, Craig J.
- ORCID
- Bryan, Craig J.
- Venue
- Alternatives to Suicide
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2020
- Pages
- 71-88
- OpenAlex
- W3004119728
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 8.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
- Keywords
- desire for death, suicidal ideation, suicidal behavior, temporal dynamics, self-regulation, suicide risk, suicide prevention interventions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
