The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Parametric models—the estimation problem
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The model assessment was performed by checking the distribution of weighted residuals over time, precision, and physiological plausibility of parameter estimates [37].”
From Modeling the effect of glucagon on endogenous glucose production in healthy individuals under meal-like conditions (2025) · cites this paper as [37]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A New Oral Model to Assess Postprandial Lactate Production Rate
Bonet, J., Galuppo, B., Santoro, N., & Man, C. D. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2021.3124143 · Cited by 6
Faggionato, E., Tonello, A., Laurenti, M. C., Vella, A., & Dalla Man, C. (2025) · American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpregu.00172.2025
Metadata
- Authors
- Cobelli, C., & Carson, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- City, University of London (GB)
- Venue
- Introduction to Modeling in Physiology and Medicine
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 207-245
- OpenAlex
- W4242880574
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Statistical and numerical algorithms
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Optimal Experimental Design Methods
- Keywords
- parameter estimation, parametric models, linear least squares, nonlinear least squares, maximum likelihood estimation, Bayesian estimation, optimal experimental design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
