The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Adolescent dopamine development
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The dopamine system is increasingly proposed to function as a 'plasticity system', where experiences can create enduring changes to behavior through their actions on the dopamine system.
“it is increasingly proposed to function as a ‘plasticity system’, where experiences can create enduring changes to behavior through their actions on the dopamine system [78, 136].”
From Adolescent nicotine exposure and persistent neurocircuitry changes: unveiling lifelong psychiatric risks (2025) · cites this paper as [78]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 88 · Cited by 10
Metadata
- Authors
- Reynolds, L. M., & Flores, C.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA)
- Venue
- Diagnosis, Management and Modeling of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 295-304
- OpenAlex
- W3166550600
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 88
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
- Keywords
- prefrontal cortex maturation, dopaminergic innervation, adolescent brain development, environmental experience, drug exposure, major depressive disorder, addiction, schizophrenia, psychopathology risk, prevention and intervention
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
