CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 15Organic Food and AgricultureSocial Capital and NetworksComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Using social network analysis to understand and enhance local and regional food systems

Rocker, Sarah, Kropczynski, Jess, Hinrichs, Clare·2022·Food Systems Modelling
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-822112-9.00015-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-822112-9.00015-1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Blumer, 1954, What is wrong with social theory?, American Sociological Review, 19, 3, 10.2307/2088165 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bodin, 2006, Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective?, Ecology and Society, 19, 3
  3. Borgatti, 2009, On social network analysis in a supply chain context, Journal of Supply Chain Management, 45, 5, 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2009.03166.x · DOI
  4. Brinkley, 2017, Visualizing the social and geographical embeddedness of local food systems, J Rural Stud, 54, 314, 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.023 · DOI
  5. Brinkley, 2018, The small world of the alternative food network, Sustainability 10.3390/su10082921, 10 · DOI
  6. Brinkley, 2021, Growing pains in local food systems: a longitudinal social network analysis on local food marketing in Baltimore County, Maryland and Chester County, Pennsylvania, Agric Human Values, 38, 911, 10.1007/s10460-021-10199-w · DOI
  7. Carboni, 2017, Using network analysis to identify key actors in collaborative governance processes, Nonprofit Policy Forum, 8, 133, 10.1515/npf-2017-0012 · DOI
  8. Chiffoleau, 2009, From politics to co-operation: the dynamics of embeddedness in alternative food supply chains, Sociol Ruralis, 49, 218, 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2009.00491.x · DOI
  9. Christensen, 2015, Using social networking analysis to measure changes in regional food systems collaboration: a methodological framework, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 5, 113, 10.5304/jafscd.2015.053.013 · DOI
  10. Crespo, 2014, Why can collective action fail in Local Agri-food Systems? A social network analysis of cheese producers in Aculco, Mexico, Food Policy, 46, 165, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2014.03.011 · DOI
  11. Cumming, 2019, Local motivations, regional implications: scaling from local to regional food systems in northeastern North Carolina, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 9, 197
  12. Dekker, 2007, Sensitivity of MRQAP tests to collinearity and autocorrelation conditions, Psychometrika, 72, 563, 10.1007/s11336-007-9016-1 · DOI
  13. Dempwolf, 2012, The uses of social network analysis in planning: a review of the literature, J Plan Lit, 27, 3, 10.1177/0885412211411092 · DOI
  14. Flora, 1993, Entrepreneurial social infrastructure: a necessary ingredient, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 529, 48, 10.1177/0002716293529001005 · DOI
  15. Forrest, 2021, Growing a sustainable local grain economy in Arizona: a multidimensional analytical case study of an alternative food network, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 10, 507
  16. Goldenberg, 2019, Building economic multipliers, rather than measuring them: community-minded ways to develop economic impacts, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 8, 153
  17. Gomez, 2011, Research Principles for Developing Country Food Value Chains, Science, 332, 1154, 10.1126/science.1202543 · DOI
  18. Granovetter, 2005, The impact of social structure on economic outcomes, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19, 33, 10.1257/0895330053147958 · DOI
  19. Harden, 2021, Cass Clay Food Partners: a networked response to COVID-19, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 10, 181
  20. Hermans, 2017, Social network analysis of multi-stakeholder platforms in agricultural research for development: opportunities and constraints for innovation and scaling, Plos One 10.1371/journal.pone.0169634, 12, 1 · DOI
  21. Jablonski, 2019, IN THIS ISSUE: what Is a ‘Multiplier’ Anyway? Assessing the Economics of Local Food Systems Toolkit, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 8, 1, 10.5304/jafscd.2019.08C.013 · DOI
  22. Khanal, 2020, Small and minority farmers’ knowledge and resource sharing networks, and farm sales: findings from communities in Tennessee, Maryland, and Delaware, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 9, 149
  23. Koliba, 2017, The critical role of information sharing to the value proposition of a food systems network, Public Management Review 10.1080/14719037.2016.1209235, 19, 284 · DOI
  24. Luxton, 2021, Mapping movements: a call for qualitative social network analysis, Qualitative Research, 21, 161, 10.1177/1468794120927678 · DOI
  25. O'Hara, 2013, Economic impacts of local food systems: future research priorities, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 3, 35
  26. Pachucki, 2011, Social network concordance in food choice among spouses, friends, and siblings, American Journal of Public Health, 101, 2170, 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300282 · DOI
  27. Plastrik, 2006, Net gains: a handbook for network builders seeking social change. Innovation Network for Communities. version. 1., Innovation Network for Communities, version. 1
  28. Scott, 2021, Farmer social connectedness and market access, J Agric Food Syst Community Dev, 10, 1, 10.5304/jafscd.2021.102.024 · DOI
  29. Sharp, 1997, Entrepreneurial social infrastructure and growth machine characteristics associated with industrial-recruitment and self-development strategies in nonmetropolitan communities, Community Development, 30, 131
  30. Snijders, 2001, The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics, Sociol Methodol, 31, 361, 10.1111/0081-1750.00099 · DOI
  31. Stork, 1992, Nonrespondents in communication network studies: problems and possibilities, Group & Organization Management, 17, 193, 10.1177/1059601192172006 · DOI
  32. Trivette, 2019, The importance of food retailers: applying network analysis techniques to the study of food systems, Agric Human Values, 36, 77, 10.1007/s10460-018-9885-1 · DOI
  33. Valente, 2017, An appraisal of social network theory and analysis as applied to public health, Annual Review of Public Health, 38, 103, 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044528 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rocker, S., Kropczynski, J., & Hinrichs, C.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Cincinnati (US)
ORCID
Venue
Food Systems Modelling
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2022
Pages
231-256
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-822112-9.00015-1
OpenAlex
W4205178806
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3
FWCI
4.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
social network analysis, local food systems, regional food systems, food system actors, relational dynamics, social networks, collaboration, information sharing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review