CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 20Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionMicrobial Fuel Cells and BioremediationCatalysts for Methane Reforming

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Status of biogas production and biogas upgrading: A global scenario

Sravan, J. Shanthi, Tharak, Athmakuri, Mohan, S. Venkata·2021·Emerging Technologies and Biological Systems for Biogas Upgrading
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-822808-1.00002-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-822808-1.00002-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 110

  1. Adnan, 2019, Technologies for biogas upgrading to biomethane: a review, Bioengineering, 6, 92, 10.3390/bioengineering6040092 · DOI
  2. Alvarez-Gutierrez, 2016, Dynamic performance of biomass-based carbons for CO2/CH4 separation. Approximation to a pressure swing adsorption process for biogas upgrading, Energy Fuels, 30, 5005, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00664 · DOI
  3. Angelidaki, 2018, Biogas upgrading and utilization: current status and perspectives, Biotechnol. Adv., 36, 452, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.011 · DOI
  4. Appels, 2008, Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 34, 755, 10.1016/j.pecs.2008.06.002 · DOI
  5. Aryal, 2018, An overview of microbial biogas enrichment, Bioresour. Technol., 264, 359, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.013 · DOI
  6. Babaee, A., Shayegan, J., 2011 Effect of organic loading rates (OLR) on production of methane from anaerobic digestion of vegetables waste. In: World Renewable Energy Congress-Sweden, 8–13 May, 2011, Linköping University Electronic Press, Linköping, Sweden, No. 057, pp. 411–417. · DOI
  7. Baek, G., Kim, J., Kim, J., Lee, C., 2018. Role and potential of direct interspecies electron transfer in anaerobic digestion. Energies 11, 107. · DOI
  8. Baena-Moreno, 2019, Recent advances in biogas purifying technologies, Int. J. Green Energy, 16, 401, 10.1080/15435075.2019.1572610 · DOI
  9. Bassani, 2015, Biogas upgrading via hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis in two-stage continuous stirred tank reactors at mesophilic and thermophilic conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 12585, 10.1021/acs.est.5b03451 · DOI
  10. Bauer, 2013, Biogas upgrading–technology overview, comparison and perspectives for the future, Biofuels, Bioprod. Bioref., 7, 499, 10.1002/bbb.1423 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Beese-Vasbender, 2015, Selective microbial electrosynthesis of methane by a pure culture of a marine lithoautotrophic archaeon, Bioelectrochemistry, 102, 50, 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2014.11.004 · DOI
  12. Bharathiraja, 2018, Biogas production–a review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 90, 570, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.093 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Castellano-Hinojosa, 2018, New concepts in anaerobic digestion processes: recent advances and biological aspects, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 102, 5065, 10.1007/s00253-018-9039-9 · DOI
  14. Cavinato, 2013, Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of waste activated sludge and source sorted biowaste in pilot-and full-scale reactors, Renew. Energy, 55, 260, 10.1016/j.renene.2012.12.044 · DOI
  15. Cetinkaya, E., Dincer, I., Naterer, G.F., 2012. Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 37 (3), 2071–2080. · DOI
  16. Chen, 2016, Challenges in biogas production from anaerobic membrane bioreactors, Renew. Energy, 98, 120, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.095 · DOI
  17. Chen, 2017, Biogas system in rural China: upgrading from decentralized to centralized?, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 78, 933, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.113 · DOI
  18. Chen, 2015, Membrane gas separation technologies for biogas upgrading, RSC Adv., 5, 24399, 10.1039/C5RA00666J · DOI
  19. Cheng, Q., Xu, C., Huang, W., Jiang, M., Yan, J., Fan, G., Zhang, J., Chen, K., Xiao, B., Song, G., 2020. Improving anaerobic digestion of piggery wastewater by alleviating stress of ammonia using biochar derived from rice straw. Environ. Technol. Innov. 19, 100948. · DOI
  20. Cheng, 2009, Direct biological conversion of electrical current into methane by electromethanogenesis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 3953, 10.1021/es803531g · DOI
  21. Christy, 2014, A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 34, 167, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.010 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Cinti, G., Bidini, G., Hemmes, K., 2019. Comparison of the solid oxide fuel cell system for micro-CHP using natural gas with a system using a mixture of natural gas and hydrogen. Appl. Energy. 238, 69–77. · DOI
  23. Collet, 2017, Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of methane production via biogas upgrading and power to gas technology, Appl. Energy, 192, 282, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.08.181 · DOI
  24. Curto, 2019, Renewable based biogas upgrading, J. Clean. Prod., 224, 50, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.176 · DOI
  25. Dahiya, 2018, Food waste biorefinery: sustainable strategy for circular bioeconomy, Bioresour. Technol., 248, 2, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.176 · DOI
  26. Deng, 2020, Improving gaseous biofuel yield from seaweed through a cascading circular bioenergy system integrating anaerobic digestion and pyrolysis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 128, 109895, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109895 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Dobre, 2014, Main factors affecting biogas production—an overview, Romanian Biotechnol. Lett., 19, 9283
  28. Dou, 2018, Bioelectrochemically assisted anaerobic digestion system for biogas upgrading and enhanced methane production, Sci. Total. Environ., 633, 1012, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.255 · DOI
  29. Dykstra, 2017, Methanogenic biocathode microbial community development and the role of bacteria, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 5306, 10.1021/acs.est.6b04112 · DOI
  30. Edison, M., 2014. Bio-methane generation from organic waste. A review. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science (WCECS), San Francisco, USA.
  31. Ellabban, 2014, Renewable energy resources: current status, future prospects and their enabling technology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 39, 748, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.113 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Fagbohungbe, M.O., Dodd, I.C., Herbert, B.M., Li, H., Ricketts, L., Semple, K.T., 2015. High solid anaerobic digestion: operational challenges and possibilities. Environ. Technol. Innov. 4, 268–284. · DOI
  33. Fu, 2015, Bioelectrochemical analyses of the development of a thermophilic biocathode catalyzing electromethanogenesis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 1225, 10.1021/es5052233 · DOI
  34. Gotz, 2016, Renewable power-to-gas: a technological and economic review, Renew. Energy, 85, 1371, 10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.066 · DOI
  35. Hajji, A., Rhachi, M., Garoum, M. and Laaroussi, N., 2016. The effects of pH, temperature and agitation on biogas production under mesophilic regime. In: 2016 Third International Conference on Renewable Energies for Developing Countries (REDEC), IEEE, pp. 1–4. · DOI
  36. Harasimowicz, 2007, Application of polyimide membranes for biogas purification and enrichment, J. Hazard. Mater., 144, 698, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.01.098 · DOI
  37. Jiang, 2019, Carbon dioxide and organic waste valorization by microbial electrosynthesis and electro-fermentation, Water Res., 149, 42, 10.1016/j.watres.2018.10.092 · DOI
  38. Jiang, 2013, Bio electrochemical systems for simultaneously production of methane and acetate from carbon dioxide at relatively high rate, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 38, 3497, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.12.107 · DOI
  39. Jin, 2017, Microbial electrolytic capture, separation and regeneration of CO2 for biogas upgrading, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 9371, 10.1021/acs.est.7b01574 · DOI
  40. Kadam, 2017, Recent advancement in biogas enrichment and its applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 73, 892, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.167 · DOI
  41. Kapoor, 2019, Evaluation of biogas upgrading technologies and future perspectives: a review, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26, 11631, 10.1007/s11356-019-04767-1 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Khalid, 2011, The anaerobic digestion of solid organic waste, Waste Manag., 31, 1737, 10.1016/j.wasman.2011.03.021 · DOI
  43. Khab, H., Chaker, A., Ziani, L., 2019. Effects of pressure and hydrogen addition to methane on the temperatures within a pressurized cylinder during the vehicle refuelling of HCNG. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 44, 22437–22444. · DOI
  44. Liu, B., Williams, I., Li, Y., Wang, L., Bagtzoglou, A., McCutcheon, J., Li, B., 2016. Towards high power output of scaled-up benthic microbial fuel cells (BMFCs) using multiple electron collectors. Biosens. Bioelectron. 79, 435–441. · DOI
  45. Liu, 2018, Biogas production and microbial community properties during anaerobic digestion of corn stover at different temperatures, Bioresour. Technol., 261, 93, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.076 · DOI
  46. Liu, 2016, Microbial electrolysis contribution to anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge, leading to accelerated methane production, Renew. Energy, 91, 334, 10.1016/j.renene.2016.01.082 · DOI
  47. Lovley, 2017, Syntrophy goes electric: direct interspecies electron transfer, Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 71, 643, 10.1146/annurev-micro-030117-020420 · DOI
  48. Luo, 2012, Integrated biogas upgrading and hydrogen utilization in an anaerobic reactor containing enriched hydrogenotrophic methanogenic culture, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 109, 2729, 10.1002/bit.24557 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Luo, 2012, Simultaneous hydrogen utilization and in situ biogas upgrading in an anaerobic reactor, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 109, 1088, 10.1002/bit.24360 · DOI
  50. Maegaard, 2019, Biogas upgrading with hydrogenotrophic methanogenic biofilms, Bioresour. Technol., 287, 121422, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121422 · DOI
  51. Mamun, 2016, Methane enrichment of biogas by carbon dioxide fixation with calcium hydroxide and activated carbon, J. Taiwan. Inst. Chem. Eng., 58, 476, 10.1016/j.jtice.2015.06.029 · DOI
  52. Meier, 2017, Photosynthetic biogas upgrading using microalgae: effect of light/dark photoperiod, Renew. Energy, 106, 17, 10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.009 · DOI
  53. Miao, H., Lu, L., Huang, Z., 2011. Flammability limits of hydrogen-enriched natural gas. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 36 (11), 6937–6947. · DOI
  54. Modestra, 2015, Electro-fermentation of real-field acidogenic spent wash effluents for additional biohydrogen production with simultaneous treatment in a microbial electrolysis cell, Sep. Purif. Technol., 150, 308, 10.1016/j.seppur.2015.05.043 · DOI
  55. Modestra, 2015, Bio-electrocatalytic reduction of CO2: Enrichment of homoacetogens and pH optimization towards enhancement of carboxylic acids biosynthesis, J. CO2 Utilization, 10, 78, 10.1016/j.jcou.2015.04.001 · DOI
  56. Moreno, 2012, Efficiency and emissions in a vehicle spark ignition engine fuelled with hydrogen and methane blends, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 37, 11495, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.04.012 · DOI
  57. Moscoviz, 2016, Electro-fermentation: how to drive fermentation using electrochemical systems, Trends Biotechnol., 34, 856, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.04.009 · DOI
  58. Muha, 2012, Mathematical modelling of process liquid flow and acetoclastic methanogenesis under mesophilic conditions in a two-phase biogas reactor, Bioresour. Technol., 106, 1, 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.087 · DOI
  59. Munoz, 2015, A review on the state-of-the-art of physical/chemical and biological technologies for biogas upgrading, Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol., 14, 727, 10.1007/s11157-015-9379-1 · DOI
  60. Nealson, 2016, Electromicrobiology: realities, grand challenges, goals and predictions, Microb. Biotechnol., 9, 595, 10.1111/1751-7915.12400 · DOI
  61. Nelabhotla, 2019, Performance analysis of biocathode in bioelectrochemical CO2 reduction, Catalysts, 9, 683, 10.3390/catal9080683 · DOI
  62. Nelabhotla, 2018, Electrochemically mediated CO2 reduction for bio-methane production: a review, Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol., 17, 531, 10.1007/s11157-018-9470-5 · DOI
  63. Nikhil, 2015, Synergistic yield of dual energy forms through biocatalyzed electrofermentation of waste: stoichiometric analysis of electron and carbon distribution, Energy, 88, 281, 10.1016/j.energy.2015.05.043 · DOI
  64. Paiano, 2019, Electro-fermentation and redox mediators enhance glucose conversion into butyric acid with mixed microbial cultures, Bioelectrochemistry, 130, 107333, 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2019.107333 · DOI
  65. Pasupuleti, 2014, Upscaling of biohydrogen production process in semi-pilot scale biofilm reactor: evaluation with food waste at variable organic loads, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 39, 7587, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.02.034 · DOI
  66. Pasupuleti, 2015, Single-stage fermentation process for high value biohythane production with the treatment of distillery spent-wash, Bioresour. Technol., 189, 177, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.128 · DOI
  67. Prasad, 2017, Recent advances in biogas production, J. Chem. Eng. Process. Technol., 3, 1038
  68. Rader, 2010, Multi-electrode continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell for biogas production from acetate, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 35, 8848, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.06.033 · DOI
  69. Raghavulu, 2012, Bioaugmentation of an electrochemically active strain to enhance the electron discharge of mixed culture: process evaluation through electro-kinetic analysis, RSC Adv., 2, 677, 10.1039/C1RA00540E · DOI
  70. Ren, 2019, Recyclable magnetite-enhanced electromethanogenesis for biomethane production from wastewater, Water Res., 166, 115095, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.115095 · DOI
  71. Roy, 2016, Biohythane production from organic wastes: present state of art, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 23, 9391, 10.1007/s11356-015-5469-4 · DOI
  72. Salihu, 2015, Upgrading strategies for effective utilization of biogas, Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 34, 1512, 10.1002/ep.12117 · DOI
  73. Sarkar, 2016, Deciphering acidogenic process towards biohydrogen, biohythane, and short chain fatty acids production: multi-output optimization strategy, Biofuel Res. J., 3, 458, 10.18331/BRJ2016.3.3.5 · DOI
  74. Sarkar, 2017, Pre-aeration of food waste to augment acidogenic process at higher organic load: valorizing biohydrogen, volatile fatty acids and biohythane, Bioresour. Technol., 242, 68, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.053 · DOI
  75. Sarkar, 2020, Synergy of anoxic microenvironment and facultative anaerobes on acidogenic metabolism in a self-induced electrofermentation system, Bioresource Technology, 313, 123604, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123604 · DOI
  76. Sarker, 2018, Overview of recent progress towards in-situ biogas upgradation techniques, Fuel, 226, 686, 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.021 · DOI
  77. Scholz, 2013, Techno-economic analysis of hybrid processes for biogas upgrading, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52, 16929, 10.1021/ie402660s · DOI
  78. Schroder, 2015, Microbial electrochemistry and technology: terminology and classification, Energy Environ. Sci., 8, 513, 10.1039/C4EE03359K · DOI
  79. Sen, 2016, State of the art and future concept of food waste fermentation to bioenergy, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 53, 547, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.065 · DOI
  80. Sharma, 2015, Hydrogen the future transportation fuel: from production to applications, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 43, 1151, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.093 · DOI
  81. Siegert, 2015, The presence of hydrogenotrophic methanogens in the inoculum improves methane gas production in microbial electrolysis cells, Front. Microbiol., 5, 778, 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00778 · DOI
  82. Singhal, 2017, Upgrading techniques for transformation of biogas to bio-CNG: a review, Int. J. Energy Res., 41, 1657, 10.1002/er.3719 · DOI
  83. Sravan, 2018, Electrofermentation of food waste–regulating acidogenesis towards enhanced volatile fatty acids production, Chem. Eng. J., 334, 1709, 10.1016/j.cej.2017.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Sravan, 2020, Electron-regulated flux towards biogas upgradation–triggering catabolism for an augmented methanogenic activity, Sustain. Energy Fuels, 4, 700, 10.1039/C9SE00604D · DOI
  85. Sreekrishnan, 2004, Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques––a review, Bioresour. Technol., 95, 1, 10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.010 · DOI
  86. Stangeland, 2017, CO2 methanation: the effect of catalysts and reaction conditions, Energy Procedia, 105, 2022, 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.577 · DOI
  87. Sun, 2015, Characterization of methane production and microbial community shifts during waste activated sludge degradation in microbial electrolysis cells, Bioresour. Technol., 175, 68, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.10.052 · DOI
  88. Sunny, 2018, Review on factors affecting biogas production, Int. J. Technol. Res. Eng., 5, 1589
  89. Talibi, M., Balachandran, R., Ladommatos, N., 2017. Influence of combusting methane-hydrogen mixtures on compression–ignition engine exhaust emissions and in-cylinder gas composition. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy. 42 (4), 2381–2396. · DOI
  90. Tan, L.C., Lin, R., Murphy, J.D., Lens, P.N.L., 2021. Granular activated carbon supplementation enhances anaerobic digestion of lipid-rich wastewaters. Renew. Energy. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.087. · DOI
  91. Tao, J., Qin, L., Liu, X., Li, B., Chen, J., You, J., Shen, Y., Chen, X., 2017. Effect of granular activated carbon on the aerobic granulation of sludge and its mechanism. Bioresour. Technol. 236, 60–67. · DOI
  92. Venkata Mohan, 2016, Waste biorefinery: a new paradigm for a sustainable bioelectro economy, Trends Biotechnol., 34, 852, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.06.006 · DOI
  93. Venkata Mohan, 2017, Waste derived bioeconomy in india: a perspective, N. Biotechnol., 40, 60
  94. Venkata Mohan, 2016, A circular bioeconomy with biobased products from CO2 sequestration, Trends Biotechnol., 34, 506, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.012 · DOI
  95. Venkata Mohan, 2009, Acidogenic fermentation of vegetable-based market waste to harness biohydrogen with simultaneous stabilization, Bioresour. Technol., 100, 3061, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.059 · DOI
  96. Venkata Mohan, 2008, Effect of anodic metabolic function on bioelectricity generation and substrate degradation in single chambered microbial fuel cell, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 8088, 10.1021/es8012529 · DOI
  97. Venkata Mohan, 2014, Microbial catalyzed electrochemical systems: a bio-factory with multi-facet applications, Bioresour. Technol., 165, 355, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.048 · DOI
  98. Vijayanand, 2017, Installation of a biogas upgradation system, AgricINTERNATIONAL, 4, 12, 10.5958/2454-8634.2017.00003.1 · DOI
  99. Villano, 2010, Bioelectrochemical reduction of CO2 to CH4 via direct and indirect extracellular electron transfer by a hydrogenophilic methanogenic culture, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 3085, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.12.077 · DOI
  100. Villano, 2017, Electrochemically-driven fermentation of organic substrates with undefined mixed microbial cultures, ChemSusChem, 10, 3091, 10.1002/cssc.201700360 · DOI
  101. Vrbova, 2017, Upgrading biogas to biomethane using membrane separation, Energy Fuels, 31, 9393, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b00120 · DOI
  102. Xu, 2014, Bioelectrochemical removal of carbon dioxide (CO2): an innovative method for biogas upgrading, Bioresour. Technol., 173, 392, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.09.127 · DOI
  103. Xu, 2018, Recent advances on the membrane processes for CO2 separation, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 26, 2280, 10.1016/j.cjche.2018.08.020 · DOI
  104. Xu, 2020, Biogas upgrading, Adv. Bioenergy, 5, 309, 10.1016/bs.aibe.2020.04.006 · DOI
  105. Yang, 2019, Metatranscriptomic evidence for classical and RuBisCO-mediated CO2 reduction to methane facilitated by direct interspecies electron transfer in a methanogenic system, Sci. Rep., 9, 1
  106. Yuan, 2013, Adsorption of CO2, CH4, and N2 on ordered mesoporous carbon: approach for greenhouse gases capture and biogas upgrading, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 5474, 10.1021/es4000643 · DOI
  107. Zhao, Z., Li, Y., Quan, X., Zhang, Y., 2017. Towards engineering application: Potential mechanism for enhancing anaerobic digestion of complex organic waste with different types of conductive materials. Water Res. 115, 266–277. · DOI
  108. Zhao, 2016, Enhanced decomposition of waste activated sludge via anodic oxidation for methane production and bioenergy recovery, Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 106, 161, 10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.10.020 · DOI
  109. Zhen, 2017, Continuous micro-current stimulation to upgrade methanolic wastewater biodegradation and biomethane recovery in an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor, Chemosphere, 180, 229, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.006 · DOI
  110. Zhou, 2017, Alternative materials in technologies for biogas upgrading via CO2 capture, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 79, 1414, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.198 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sravan, J. S., Tharak, A., & Mohan, S. V.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Chemical Technology (IN)
ORCID
Venue
Emerging Technologies and Biological Systems for Biogas Upgrading
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2021
Pages
3-26
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-822808-1.00002-7
OpenAlex
W3144502725
Cited by
20
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7
FWCI
14.70
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Catalysts for Methane Reforming
Keywords
biogas upgrading, biogas production, anaerobic digestion, methane yield, CO2 sequestration, electrochemical CO2 reduction, carbon footprint reduction, circular economy, bioproducts, wastewater treatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review