CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22Renewable energy and sustainable power systemsHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsBiofuel production and bioconversion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Overview of sustainable fuel and energy technologies

Quereshi, Shireen, Jadhao, Prashant Ram, Pandey, Ashish, Ahmad, Ejaz, Pant, K.K.·2021·Sustainable Fuel Technologies Handbook
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-12-822989-7.00001-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-822989-7.00001-9

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 108

  1. Zou, 2016, Energy revolution: from a fossil energy era to a new energy era, Nat. Gas. Ind. B, 3, 1, 10.1016/j.ngib.2016.02.001 · DOI
  2. Schobert, 2002, Chemicals and materials from coal in the 21st century, Fuel, 81, 15, 10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00203-9 · DOI
  3. Mohr, 2015, Projection of world fossil fuels by country, Fuel, 141, 120, 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.10.030 · DOI
  4. Abas, 2015, Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies, Futures, 69, 31, 10.1016/j.futures.2015.03.003 · DOI
  5. Höök, 2013, Depletion of fossil fuels and anthropogenic climate change-a review, Energy Policy, 52, 797, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.046 · DOI
  6. Mboowa, 2017, Qualitative determination of energy potential and methane generation from municipal solid waste (MSW) in Dhanbad (India), Energy, 123, 386, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.009 · DOI
  7. Burke, 2018, Political power and renewable energy futures: a critical review, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 35, 78, 10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.018 · DOI
  8. Fouquet, 2012, Past and prospective energy transitions: insights from history, Energy Policy, 50, 1, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.014 · DOI
  9. Day, 2017, Climate change, fossil fuel prices and depletion: the rationale for a falling export tax, Econ. Model., 63, 153, 10.1016/j.econmod.2017.01.006 · DOI
  10. H. Lund, Chapter 1 Introduction, Renewable Energy Systems: The Choice and Modeling of 100% Renewable Solutions 2010, 1–12, Elsevier. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-3750280.00001-7. · DOI
  11. Solangi, 2011, A review on global solar energy policy, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15, 2149, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.007 · DOI
  12. Kannan, 2016, Solar energy for future world: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 62, 1092, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.022 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Green, 2002, Photovoltaic principles, Phys. E, 14, 11, 10.1016/S1386-9477(02)00354-5 · DOI
  14. Roth, 2005, Cheap two axis sun following device, Energy Convers. Manage, 46, 1179, 10.1016/j.enconman.2004.06.015 · DOI
  15. Razykov, 2011, Solar photovoltaic electricity: current status and future prospects, Sol. Energy, 85, 1580, 10.1016/j.solener.2010.12.002 · DOI
  16. Obeidat, 2018, A comprehensive review of future photovoltaic systems, Sol. Energy, 163, 545, 10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.050 · DOI
  17. Eltamaly, 2018, A novel evaluation index for the photovoltaic maximum power point tracker techniques, Sol. Energy, 174, 940, 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.060 · DOI
  18. Gholami, 2018, Experimental investigation of dust deposition effects on photo-voltaic output performance, Sol. Energy, 159, 346, 10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.010 · DOI
  19. Mussard, 2018, Performance of solar photovoltaic modules under arid climatic conditions: a review, Sol. Energy, 174, 409, 10.1016/j.solener.2018.08.071 · DOI
  20. Gielen, 2019, The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation, Energy Strategy Rev., 24, 38, 10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Peters, 2020, A systematic review and meta-analysis of GIS use to reveal trends in offshore wind energy research and offer insights on best practices, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 128, 109916, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.109916 · DOI
  22. Ramsi, 2020, Barriers to onshore wind energy implementation: a systematic review, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 60, 101337, 10.1016/j.erss.2019.101337 · DOI
  23. Baxter, 2020, Energy research & social science scale, history and justice in community wind energy: an empirical review, Energy Res. Soc. Sci., 68, 101532, 10.1016/j.erss.2020.101532 · DOI
  24. Shahzad, 2019, Environmental impact and pollution-related challenges of renewable wind energy paradigm – a review, Sci. Total. Environ., 683, 436, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.274 · DOI
  25. C. Mone et al., Cost of wind energy review 2015 cost of wind energy review, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL/TP-6A20-66861, 2017. · DOI
  26. Y. Gong, Z. Yang, X. Shan, Y. Sun, T. Xie, Capturing flow energy from ocean and wind. Energies (2019) 12, 2184. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/en12112184. · DOI
  27. Manzano-agugliaro, 2013, Scientific production of renewable energies worldwide: an overview, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 18, 134, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.020 · DOI
  28. Bildirici, 2017, Environmental pollution, hydropower energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from G7 countries, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 75, 68, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.052 · DOI
  29. Liu, 2013, Sustainability in hydropower development – a case study, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 19, 230, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.11.036 · DOI
  30. Botelho, 2017, Assessment of the environmental impacts associated with hydropower, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 70, 896, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.271 · DOI
  31. Can, 2019, Is the hydropower boom actually taking place? A case study of a South East European country, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 110, 278, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.077 · DOI
  32. Sipahutar, 2013, Renewable energy and hydropower utilization tendency worldwide, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 17, 213, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.09.010 · DOI
  33. Wagner, 2020, Current hydropower developments in Europe, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 37, 41, 10.1016/j.cosust.2019.06.002 · DOI
  34. Nautiyal, 2020, Sustainability assessment of hydropower projects, J. Clean. Prod., 265, 121661, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121661 · DOI
  35. H. Production et al., Hydrogen production by electrical energy, Sustainable Hydrogen Production. 2016, 99–161, Elsevier. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801563-6.00003-0. · DOI
  36. States, 2014, Hydroelectricity hydroelectricity, Future Energy, 215
  37. Kilama, 2013, Review of small hydropower technology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 26, 515, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.006 · DOI
  38. Xu, 2017, Integrated technological paradigm-based soft paths towards sustainable development of small hydropower, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 70, 623, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.021 · DOI
  39. Paish, 2002, Small hydro power: technology and current status, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 6, 537, 10.1016/S1364-0321(02)00006-0 · DOI
  40. Panwar, 2011, Role of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15, 1513, 10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037 · DOI
  41. Fridleifsson, 2001, Geothermal energy for the benefit of the people, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 5, 299, 10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00002-8 · DOI
  42. Bertani, 2016, Geothermal power generation in the world 2010–2014 update report, Geothermics, 60, 31, 10.1016/j.geothermics.2015.11.003 · DOI
  43. H. Kalusekara, V. Seynulabdeen, A review of geothermal energy for future power generation, in: Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Advances in Electrical Engineering (ICAEE), 26–28 September, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2019, pp. 26–28. · DOI
  44. Soltani, 2019, A comprehensive review of geothermal energy evolution and development, Int. J. Green. Energy, 16, 971, 10.1080/15435075.2019.1650047 · DOI
  45. Wang, 2018, A comprehensive review of geothermal energy extraction and utilization in oilfields, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 168, 465, 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.05.012 · DOI
  46. Barbier, 1997, Nature and technology of geothermal energy: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 1, 1, 10.1016/S1364-0321(97)00001-4 · DOI
  47. Wilberforce, 2019, Overview of ocean power technology, Energy, 175, 165, 10.1016/j.energy.2019.03.068 · DOI
  48. Melikoglu, 2018, Current status and future of ocean energy sources: a global review, Ocean. Eng., 148, 563, 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.11.045 · DOI
  49. Zabihian, 2011, Review of marine renewable energies: case study of Iran, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 15, 2461, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.006 · DOI
  50. Bonar, 2015, Social and ecological impacts of marine energy development, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 47, 486, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.068 · DOI
  51. Winskel, 2006, Energy policy and institutional context: marine energy innovation systems, Sci. Public. Policy, 33, 365, 10.3152/147154306781778939 · DOI
  52. Uihlein, 2016, Wave and tidal current energy – a review of the current state of research beyond technology, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 58, 1070, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.284 · DOI
  53. S. Quereshi, E. Ahmad, K.K. Pant, and S. Dutta, Recent advances in production of biofuel and commodity chemicals from algal biomass, In: S.K. Gupta, A. Malik, and F. Bux, (Eds), Algal Biofuels: Recent Advances and Future Prospects, 2017, Springer, 394–416. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51010-1. · DOI
  54. S. Quereshi, S. Dutta, Synthesis of biomass derived platform chemicals & fuel additives, in: Proceedeings of 5th Asia Oceana Conference on Green and Sustainable Chemistry, RSC, 2015, p. 134.
  55. Wang, 2012, A critical review on additives to reduce ash related operation problems in biomass combustion applications, Energy Procedia, 20, 20, 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.03.004 · DOI
  56. Jones, 2000, A comprehensive biomass combustion model, Renew. Energy, 19, 229, 10.1016/S0960-1481(99)00036-1 · DOI
  57. Li, 2015, Characterization of biomass combustion at high temperatures based on an upgraded single particle model, Appl. Energy, 156, 749, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.027 · DOI
  58. Sonal, 2019, Biomass-derived CO2 rich syngas conversion to higher hydrocarbon via Fischer-Tropsch process over Fe–Co bimetallic catalyst, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 44, 27741, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.015 · DOI
  59. Ahmad, 2018, Integrated thermo-catalytic reforming of residual sugarcane bagasse in a laboratory scale reactor, Fuel Process. Technol., 171, 277, 10.1016/j.fuproc.2017.11.020 · DOI
  60. Thomson, 2020, Clean syngas from small commercial biomass gasifiers; a review of gasifier development, recent advances and performance evaluation, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.05.160 · DOI
  61. Zhang, 2017, Dioxins from biomass combustion: an overview, Waste Biomass Valoriz., 8, 1, 10.1007/s12649-016-9744-5 · DOI
  62. Míguez, 2012, Review of technology in small-scale biomass combustion systems in the European market, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 16, 3867, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.03.044 · DOI
  63. Abuelnuor, 2014, Characteristics of biomass in flameless combustion: a review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 33, 363, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.079 · DOI
  64. Cruz, 2019, Critical review of key variables affecting potential recycling applications of ash produced at large-scale biomass combustion plants, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 150, 104427, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104427 · DOI
  65. Vicente, 2018, An overview of particulate emissions from residential biomass combustion, Atmos. Res., 199, 159, 10.1016/j.atmosres.2017.08.027 · DOI
  66. Mladenović, 2018, Denitrification techniques for biomass combustion, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 82, 3350, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.054 · DOI
  67. Vassilev, 2017, Ash contents and ash-forming elements of biomass and their significance for solid biofuel combustion, Fuel, 208, 377, 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.07.036 · DOI
  68. Parascanu, 2017, Valorization of Mexican biomasses through pyrolysis, combustion and gasification processes, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 71, 509, 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.079 · DOI
  69. Nunes, 2016, Biomass combustion systems: a review on the physical and chemical properties of the ashes, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 53, 235, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.08.053 · DOI
  70. García, 2015, Study of biomass combustion wastes, Fuel, 148, 152, 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.01.079 · DOI
  71. Sikarwar, 2016, An overview of advances in biomass gasification, Energy Environ. Sci., 9, 2939, 10.1039/C6EE00935B · DOI
  72. Salam, 2018, A review of hydrogen production via biomass gasification and its prospect in Bangladesh, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 43, 14944, 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.06.043 · DOI
  73. Buragohain, 2010, Biomass gasification for decentralized power generation: the Indian perspective, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 14, 73, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.07.034 · DOI
  74. Sansaniwal, 2017, Recent advances in the development of biomass gasification technology: a comprehensive review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 72, 363, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.038 · DOI
  75. A. Molino, V. Larocca, S. Chianese, D. Musmarra, A. Review, Biofuels production by biomass gasification: a review, Energies 11 (811) (2018) 1–31. · DOI
  76. Shahabuddin, 2020, A review on the production of renewable aviation fuels from the gasification of biomass and residual wastes, Bioresour. Technol., 312, 123596, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123596 · DOI
  77. Morales, 2013, Biomass gasification for electricity generation: review of current technology barriers, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 18, 174, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.021 · DOI
  78. Sansaniwal, 2017, Global challenges in the sustainable development of biomass gasification: an overview, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 80, 23, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.215 · DOI
  79. Widjaya, 2018, Gasification of non-woody biomass: a literature review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 89, 184, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.023 · DOI
  80. Mednikov, 2018, A review of technologies for multistage wood biomass gasification, Therm. Eng., 65, 531, 10.1134/S0040601518080037 · DOI
  81. Motta, 2018, Biomass gasification in fluidized beds: a review of biomass moisture content and operating pressure effects Ingrid, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 94, 998, 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.042 · DOI
  82. Xu, 2020, Mini-review on char catalysts for tar reforming during biomass gasification: the importance of char structure, Energy Fuels, 34, 1219, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b03725 · DOI
  83. Guedes, 2018, Operating parameters for bio-oil production in biomass pyrolysis: a review, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 129, 134, 10.1016/j.jaap.2017.11.019 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Yeo, 2019, Comparative studies on the pyrolysis of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin based on combined kinetics, J. Energy Inst., 92, 27, 10.1016/j.joei.2017.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  85. Collard, 2014, A review on pyrolysis of biomass constituents: mechanisms and composition of the products obtained from the conversion of cellulose, hemicelluloses and lignin, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 38, 594, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.06.013 · DOI
  86. Zhou, 2014, Slow and fast pyrolysis of Douglas-fir lignin: importance of liquid-intermediate formation on the distribution of products, Biomass Bioenergy, 66, 398, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.064 · DOI
  87. Zhou, 2014, Slow and fast pyrolysis of Douglas-fir lignin: importance of liquid-intermediate formation on the distribution of products, Biomass Bioenergy, 1
  88. P.A. Brownsort, Biomass pyrolysis processes: review of scope, control and variability, UK Biochar Research Centre Report, 2009.
  89. Dai, 2019, Integrated process of lignocellulosic biomass torrefaction and pyrolysis for upgrading bio-oil production: a state-of-the-art review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 107, 20, 10.1016/j.rser.2019.02.015 · DOI
  90. Kan, 2016, Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 57, 1126, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Wang, 2017, Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: a state-of-the-art review, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 62, 33, 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.004 · DOI
  92. Baeyens, 2015, Challenges and opportunities in improving the production of bio-ethanol, Prog. Energy Combust. Sci., 47, 60, 10.1016/j.pecs.2014.10.003 · DOI
  93. Bozell, 2010, Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates—the US Department of Energy’s ‘Top 10’ revisited, Green. Chem., 12, 539, 10.1039/b922014c · DOI · Paper page
  94. Singh, 2010, Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: challenges and perspectives, Bioresour. Technol., 101, 5003, 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.062 · DOI
  95. Jenkins, 2013, Potential renewable oxygenated biofuels for the aviation and road transport sectors, Fuel, 103, 593, 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.08.019 · DOI
  96. G.R. Wilson, T. Edwards, E. Corporan, R.L. Freerks, Certification of alternative aviation fuels and blend components (2013) Energy & Fuels, ACS. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef301888b. · DOI
  97. Dewei, 2016, Collagen-immobilized lipases show good activity and reusability for butyl butyrate synthesis, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 180, 826, 10.1007/s12010-016-2136-2 · DOI
  98. M.I. Alam, S. Gupta, E. Ahmad, and M.A. Haider, Integrated bio- and chemocatalytic processing for biorenewable chemicals and fuels. Sustainable Catalytic Processes. 2015, Elsevier. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-59567-6.00006-6. · DOI
  99. Alam, 2016, Development of 6-amyl-α-pyrone as a potential biomass-derived platform molecule, Green. Chem., 18, 6399, 10.1039/C6GC02528E · DOI
  100. Bohre, 2015, Upgrading furfurals to drop-in biofuels: an overview, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 3, 1263, 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b00271 · DOI
  101. Ahmad, 2016, Catalytic and mechanistic insights into the production of ethyl levulinate from biorenewable feedstocks, Green. Chem., 18, 4804, 10.1039/C6GC01523A · DOI
  102. Gupta, 2017, Efficient utilization of potash alum as a green catalyst for production of furfural, 5-hydroxymethylfurfural and levulinic acid from mono-sugars, RSC Adv., 7, 10.1039/C7RA07147G · DOI
  103. Quereshi, 2017, Insights into the metal salt catalyzed ethyl levulinate synthesis from biorenewable feedstocks, Catal. Today, 291, 187, 10.1016/j.cattod.2016.12.019 · DOI
  104. Quereshi, 2019, Insights into microwave-assisted synthesis of 5-ethoxymethylfurfural and ethyl levulinate using tungsten disulfide as catalyst, ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng.
  105. Ahmad, 2019, Insights into the synthesis of ethyl levulinate under microwave and nonmicrowave heating conditions, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 58, 16055, 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01137 · DOI
  106. Quereshi, 2019, Synthesis and characterization of zirconia supported silicotungstic acid for ethyl levulinate production, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 58, 16045, 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01659 · DOI
  107. Ahmad, 2020, Understanding reaction kinetics, deprotonation and solvation of brønsted acidic protons in heteropolyacid catalyzed synthesis of biorenewable alkyl levulinates, Chem. Eng. J., 400, 125916, 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125916 · DOI
  108. Quereshi, 2020, Unfolding the role of molybdenum disulfide as a catalyst to produce platform chemicals from biorenewable resources, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Quereshi, S., Jadhao, P. R., Pandey, A., Ahmad, E., & Pant, K. K.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
ORCID
Venue
Sustainable Fuel Technologies Handbook
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2021
Pages
3-25
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-822989-7.00001-9
OpenAlex
W3090363615
Cited by
22
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
7.36
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Energy Engineering and Power Technology › Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biofuel production and bioconversion
Keywords
sustainable fuel production, renewable energy technologies, biomass conversion, solar energy, wind energy, hydropower, biofuels

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review