CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Water reuse in the frame of circular economy

Wanner, Jiří, Srb, Martin, Beneš, Ondřej·2023·Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-323-99920-5.00014-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-323-99920-5.00014-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Angelakis, 2018, Water reuse: from ancient to modern times and the future, Frontiers in Environmental Science 10.3389/fenvs.2018.00026, 6 · DOI
  2. Shoushtarian, 2020, Worldwide regulations and guidelines for agricultural water reuse: a critical review, Water 10.3390/w12040971, 12, 971, 10.3390/w12040971 · DOI
  3. Ofori, 2021, Treated wastewater reuse for irrigation: pros and cons, Sci Total Environ, 760, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144026 · DOI
  4. Hochstrat, 2005, Wastewater reclamation and reuse in Europe: a model-based potential estimation, Water Supply, 5, 67, 10.2166/ws.2005.0009 · DOI
  5. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC109291 doi:10.2760/804116 · DOI
  6. https://doi.org/10.3403/BSEN12255 · DOI
  7. Sadeler, 2012, Principle of subsidiarity and the EU environmental policy, Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law online, 9, 63, 10.1163/187601012X632256 · DOI
  8. Terrapon-Pfa, 2020, Water demand scenarios for electricity generation at the global and regional levels, MDPI, 12, 2482
  9. BP (2021). Statistical review of world energy, 70th ed. Available at www.bp.com.
  10. EurEau (2021). Europe’s water in figures – 2021 edition. Available at www.eureau.org.
  11. Gerten, 2011, Global water availability and requirements for future food production, Water and Global Change, 12, 885
  12. Chipman, 2020, California water futures begin trading amid fear of scarcity, Bloomberg Green J
  13. Jeníček, 2013, Energy self-sufficient sewage wastewater treatment plants: is optimized anaerobic sludge digestion the key?, Water Science & Technology, 68, 1739, 10.2166/wst.2013.423 · DOI
  14. Mesa-Pérez, 2020, Analysis of barriers and opportunities for reclaimed wastewater use for agriculture in Europe, Water 10.3390/w12082308, 12, 2308, 10.3390/w12082308 · DOI
  15. Sheikh, 2017, Significance to human health of carbamazepine detected in fruits and vegetables irrigated with recycled water, Water Science & Technology, 75, 1059, 10.2166/wst.2016.585 · DOI
  16. Molinos-Senante, 2013, Tariffs and cost recovery in water reuse, Water Resour Manage, 27, 1797, 10.1007/s11269-012-0111-4 · DOI
  17. Rogowska, 2020, Micropollutants in treated wastewater, Ambio, 49, 487, 10.1007/s13280-019-01219-5 · DOI
  18. Hamoda, 2004, Sand filtration of wastewater for tertiary treatment and water reuse, Desalination, 164, 203, 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00189-4 · DOI
  19. Hassen, 2020, UV disinfection of treated wastewater in a large scale pilot plant ant inactivation of selected bacteria in a laboratory UV device, Bioresour Technol, 74, 141, 10.1016/S0960-8524(99)00179-0 · DOI
  20. Takeuchi, 2020, Water reuse and recycling in Japan – history, current situation, and future perspectives, Water Cycle, 1, 1, 10.1016/j.watcyc.2020.05.001 · DOI
  21. Kitis, 2004, Disinfection of wastewater with peracetic acid: a review, Environ Int, 30, 47, 10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00147-8 · DOI
  22. Jiang, 2013, Occurrence, transportation, monitoring and treatment of emerging micro-pollutants in waste water – a review from global views, Microchem J, 110, 293, 10.1016/j.microc.2013.04.014 · DOI
  23. Scheurer, 2012, Occurrence and fate of the antidiabetic drug metformin and its metabolite guanylurea in the environment and during drinking water treatment, Water Res, 46, 4790, 10.1016/j.watres.2012.06.019 · DOI
  24. Khanzada, 2020, Removal of organic micropollutants using advanced membrane-based water and wastewater treatment: a review, J Membr Sci, 598, 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.117672 · DOI
  25. Cazurra, 2008, Water reuse of south Barcelona’s wastewater reclamation plant, Desalination, 218, 43, 10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.019 · DOI
  26. Salgot, 2012, Golf course irrigation with reclaimed water in the Mediterranean: a risk management matter, Water, 4, 389, 10.3390/w4020389 · DOI
  27. Almendros, 2020, Theme parks in Europe: when water is an attraction, Smart Water Mag, 18, 11
  28. Hill, 2014, The Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park water recycling system, London, Altern Water Supply Syst, 1, 309

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wanner, J., Srb, M., & Beneš, O.
Venue
Current Developments in Biotechnology and Bioengineering
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2023
Pages
221-266
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-323-99920-5.00014-7
Cited by
3
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review