The genetics of multiple sclerosis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multiple sclerosis aggregates in families, with siblings and offspring of people with MS being far more likely to develop the disease themselves.
“aggregates in certain families and that siblings and offspring of people with MS are far more likely to develop the disease themselves.7”
From Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis (2018) · cites this paper as [7]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genome‐wide association studies of multiple sclerosis
Cotsapas, C., & Mitrovic, M. (2018) · Clinical & Translational Immunology · doi:10.1002/cti2.1018 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
- Authors
- Compston, A., & Wekerle, H.
- Venue
- McAlpine's Multiple Sclerosis
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 113-181
- OpenAlex
- W3022436243
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 7.39
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Psoriasis: Treatment and Pathogenesis
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, genetics, genetic susceptibility, susceptibility genes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review