Eliminating the Security Weakness of Linux and UNIX Operating Systems
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Protecting execution environments and avoiding writable paths in PATH can help mitigate the risk of script hijacking or privilege abuse.
“Protecting execution environments and avoiding writable paths in PATH can also help mitigate the risk of script hijacking or privilege abuse (Santana 2025).”
From Modern Approaches to Unix Automation: Shell Scripting, Configuration Management, and Security (2025) · cites this paper as Santana 2025
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Modern Approaches to Unix Automation: Shell Scripting, Configuration Management, and Security
Madamanchi, S. R. (2025) · International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology · doi:10.22214/ijraset.2025.72773 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Santana, M. D.
- Corresponding author
- Santana, Mario D.
- Venue
- Computer and Information Security Handbook
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2025
- Pages
- 217-233
- OpenAlex
- W4402065262
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Security and Verification in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
- Keywords
- Linux security, UNIX security, operating system hardening, system vulnerabilities, access control, firewall, intrusion detection, malware protection, system updates, security audit, compliance, threat monitoring, integrity assurance, security posture
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review