CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 2Child Development and Digital TechnologyImpact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Media and Philosophy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Investigating children's health and wellbeing in a digital world: A rapid review of the evidence on children's internet use and outcomes

Stoilova, Mariya, Livingstone, Sonia, Khazbak, Rana·2024·Resilient Health
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-443-18529-8.00067-6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-443-18529-8.00067-6

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 2

Metadata

Authors
Stoilova, M., Livingstone, S., & Khazbak, R.
Affiliations
  • London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
ORCID
Venue
Resilient Health
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2024
Pages
809-818
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-443-18529-8.00067-6
OpenAlex
W4400134509
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2
FWCI
5.90
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
  • London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Digital Media and Philosophy
Keywords
children's internet use, child health, child well-being, digital technologies, COVID-19 pandemic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review