Clinical neurophysiology of multiple sclerosis
Abstract
The availability of new treatments able to modify the natural course of multiple sclerosis (MS) has generated interest in paraclinical measures to monitor disease evolution. Among these, neurophysiologic measures, mainly evoked potentials (EPs), are used in the functional assessment of central sensorimotor and cognitive networks affected by MS. EP abnormalities may reveal subclinical lesions, objectivate the involvement of sensory and motor pathways in the presence of vague disturbances, and provide indications of the demyelinating nature of the disease process. However, their diagnostic value is much lower than that of magnetic resonance imaging, and is more sensitive to brain and cervical spinal cord lesions. The application of EPs in assessing disease severity and monitoring the evolution of nervous damage is more promising, thanks to their good correlation with disability in cross-sectional and longitudinal studies, and potential use as paraclinical endpoints in clinical trials. Recent evidence indicates that EPs performed early in the disease may help to predict a worse future progression in the long term. If confirmed, these data suggest the possible usefulness of EPs in the early identification of patients who are more likely to develop future disability, thus requiring more frequent monitoring or being potential candidates for more aggressive disease-modifying treatments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In some patients with suspected MS, further supportive information can be obtained from cerebrospinal fluid examination and neurophysiological testing.
“but in some patients, further supportive information can be obtained from cerebrospinal fluid examination and neurophysiological testing.”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [16]
A prolonged latency and well-preserved waveform on evoked potential testing is suggestive of demyelination but is not specific.
“A prolonged latency and well-preserved waveform on evoked potential testing is suggestive of demyelination but is not specific.16”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [16]
Cites
Long-term remyelination after optic neuritis
Brusa, A., Jones, S. J., & Plant, G. T. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.3.468 · Cited by 165 · see citing works
Papageorgiou, C. C., Sfagos, C., Kosma, K. K., Kontoangelos, K. A., Triantafyllou, N., Vassilopoulos, D., Rabavilas, A. D., & Soldatos, C. R. (2007) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.07.005 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701 · see citing works
- Authors
- Leocani, L., & Comı, G.
- Affiliations
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
- Venue
- Handbook of Clinical Neurology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2014
- Volume
- 122
- Pages
- 671-679
- ISSN
- 0072-9752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W122088443
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2
- FWCI
- 12.01
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Handbook of clinical neurology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Peripheral Nerve Disorders
- Keywords
- multiple sclerosis, evoked potentials, disease surveillance, disability progression, disease-modifying therapy, subclinical lesions, demyelination, cognitive impairment, clinical trial endpoints
- MeSH terms
- Brain, Cognition, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Multiple Sclerosis, Disease Progression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review