CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 76

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nature and Aims of Geomorphological Mapping

Dramis, Francesco, Guida, Domenico, Cestari, Antonello·2011·Developments in Earth Surface Processes
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-444-53446-0.00003-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-53446-0.00003-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selected slope classes are usually divided arbitrarily into increments of 5% slope or defined according to geomorphological guidelines.

    “The selected slope classes are usually divided up arbitrarily into increments of 5% of slope (e.g., Sécher 2017) or defined according to geomorphological guidelines (Demek and Embleton 1978;Dramis et al. 2011).”

    From Mobility of paleolithic populations: biomechanical considerations and spatiotemporal modelling (2021) · cites this paper as Dramis et al. 2011

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 121

  1. Anders, 2011, Segmentation optimization and stratified object-based analysis for semi-automated geomorphological mapping, Rem. Sens. Environ., 10.1016/j.rse.2011.05.007 · DOI
  2. Aringoli, 2008, Geomorphological features and 3D modelling of Montelparo mass movement (Central Italy), Eng. Geol., 99, 70, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2007.11.005 · DOI
  3. Arko, 2005, Texture-based landform segmentation of LiDAR imagery, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation, 6, 261
  4. Arrell, 2007, A fuzzy k-means classification of elevation derivatives to extract the natural landforms in Snowdonia, Wales, Comput. Geosci., 33, 1366, 10.1016/j.cageo.2007.05.005 · DOI
  5. Bailey, 1987, Suggested hierarchy of criteria for multiscale ecosystem mapping, Landsc. Urban Plan., 14, 313, 10.1016/0169-2046(87)90042-9 · DOI
  6. Baker, C., Skene, D., Babu, D., 2009. A nationally consistent geomorphic classification of the Australian Coastal Zone. Abstracts of the Seventh International Conference on Geomorphology, July 2009, Melbourne, Australia (CD-ROM).
  7. Barsch, 1987, Geomorphological mapping of high mountain relief, Federal Republic of Germany (with geomorphology map of Königsee, scale 1:25,000), Mt. Res. Dev., 7, 361, 10.2307/3673285 · DOI
  8. Barsch, 1980, Principles, scientific value and practical applicability of the geomorphological map of the Federal Republic of Germany at the scale of 1:25,000 (GMK 25) and 1:100,000 (GMK 100), Z. Geomorphol. N.F. Suppl. Band, 36, 296
  9. Bashenina, 1981, Space imagery analysis for a geomorphological map of the world, Sov. J. Remote Sens., 6, 861
  10. Bashenina, 1968, Project to the unified key to the detailed geomorphological map of the world, Folia Geogr. Ser. Geogr. Phys., 2, 1
  11. Bisci, 1992, Geomorphologic-seismic zonation of the Marche Region (Central Italy) using computer aided techniques: preliminary considerations, ITC J., 1992-2, 196
  12. Bishr, 1998, Overcoming the semantic and other barriers to GIS interoperability, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 12, 299, 10.1080/136588198241806 · DOI
  13. Blaschke, T., 2003. Object-based contextual image classification built on image segmentation. IEEE Proceedings, Washington, DC (CD-ROM).
  14. Blaschke, 2001, What's wrong with pixels? Some recent developments interfacing remote sensing and GIS, GIS-Zeitschrift für Geoinformationssysteme, 6, 12
  15. Blasi, C., Guida, D., Siervo, V., Paolanti, M., Michetti, L., Capotorti, C., et al., 2007. Defining and mapping the landscape of Italy. Advance and Application of Landscape Character Mapping, Proceedings of the 7th IALE Congress – part 1, pp. 572–573.
  16. Bocco, 2001, Remote sensing and GIS-base regional geomorphological mapping – a tool for land use planning in developing countries, Geomorphology, 39, 211, 10.1016/S0169-555X(01)00027-7 · DOI
  17. Brancaccio, 1994, Carta geomorfologica d’Italia – 1:50.000. Guida al Rilevamento, Quaderni del Servizio Geologico Nazionale, ser. III, 4, 1
  18. Bridgland, D.R., 1986. Clast Lithological Analysis. Technical Guide 3. Quaternary Research Association, Cambridge, UK.
  19. Brunsden, 1993, The persistence of landforms, Z. Geomorphol. N.F. Suppl. Band, 93, 13
  20. Brunsden, 2003, Geomorphology, engineering and planning, Geogr. Pol., 76, 185
  21. Brunsden, 1975, Large-scale geomorphological mapping and highway engineering design, Q. J. Eng. Geol., 8, 227, 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1975.008.04.01 · DOI
  22. Bull, 1975, Allometric change of landforms, GSA Bull., 86, 1489, 10.1130/0016-7606(1975)86<1489:ACOL>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  23. Burbank, 1996, Interactions of growing folds and coeval depositional systems, Basin Res., 8, 199, 10.1046/j.1365-2117.1996.00181.x · DOI
  24. Burnett, 2003, A multi-scale segmentation/object relationship modelling methodology for landscape analysis, Ecol. Modell., 168, 233, 10.1016/S0304-3800(03)00139-X · DOI
  25. Burrough, 2000, High resolution landform classification using fuzzy k-means, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 113, 37, 10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00011-1 · DOI
  26. Burrough, 2001, Fuzzy k-means classification of topoclimatic data as an aid to forest mapping in the Greater Yellowstone Area, USA, Landsc. Ecol., 16, 523, 10.1023/A:1013167712622 · DOI
  27. Buza, 1997, A general geomorphological map of Romania on the scale of 1:25,000, Zlatna sheet, GeoJournal, 41, 85, 10.1023/A:1006869916372 · DOI
  28. Canoba, 1982, Geomorphological mapping using Landsat imagery: a case study in Argentina, ITC J., 1982–3, 324
  29. Cardinali, 2002, A geomorphological approach to the estimation of landslide hazards and risks in Umbria, Central Italy, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 2, 57, 10.5194/nhess-2-57-2002 · DOI
  30. Christian, C.S., 1958. The concepts of land units and land systems. Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the Pacific Science Association, Bangkok, Thailand, 1957, vol. 20, pp. 74–81.
  31. Christian, C.S., Stewart, G.A., 1968. Methodology of integrated surveys. Proceedings of the Toulouse Conference, 1964, Natural Research Series, UNESCO, vol. 6, pp. 233–280.
  32. Coe, 2003, Seasonal movement of the Slumgullion landslide determined from global positioning system surveys and field instrumentation, July 1998–March 2002, Eng. Geol., 68, 67, 10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00199-0 · DOI
  33. Coltorti, M., Dramis, F., Gentili, B., Pambianchi, G., Sorriso-Valvo, M., 1986. Aspetti geomorfologici. In: Crescenti, U., (Ed.), La grande frana di Ancona, Studi Geologici Camerti, vol. spec., pp. 29–39. · DOI
  34. Cornelius, 2006, GPS, GIS and geomorphological field work, Earth Surf. Process. Landforms, 19, 777, 10.1002/esp.3290190904 · DOI
  35. De Graaff, 1987, A geomorphological mapping system at scale 1:10,000 for mountainous areas, Z. Geomorphol. N.F., 13, 229, 10.1127/zfg/31/1987/229 · DOI
  36. De Pippo, T., Guida, D., Lanzara, V., Siervo, V., Valente, A., 2007. Criteri, metodi e procedure innovative per la redazione di cartografia geomorfologica gerarchica multiscalare: proposte operative in ambiente GIS. Convegno Nazionale AIGEO ‘Ambiente Geomorfologico e Attività dell’Uomo: Risorse, Rischi, Impatti’, Torino, 28–30 marzo 2007, pp. 230–234.
  37. Dikau, 1990, Derivatives from detailed geoscientific maps using computer methods, Z. Geomorphol. N.F., 80, 45
  38. Dikau, 1992, Aspects of constructing a digital geomorphological base map, Geol. Jahrb. A, 122, 357
  39. Dikau, R., Brabb, E.E., Mark, R.M., 1991. Landform classification of New Mexico by computer. US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey. Open-file report, pp. 91–634. · DOI
  40. Drăguţ, 2006, Automated classification of landform elements using object-based image analysis, Geomorphology, 81, 330, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.04.013 · DOI
  41. Embleton, C., 1985. Techniques, problems and uses of mega-geomorphological mapping. In: Hayden, R.S. (Ed.), Global Mega-Geomorphology, NASA CP-2312, pp. 84–88.
  42. Etzelmüller, 2001, Mapping and modelling the occurrence and distribution of mountain permafrost, Nor. Geogr. Tidsskr., 55, 186, 10.1080/00291950152746513 · DOI
  43. Faccini, 2008, Applied geomorphological map of the Portofino Municipal Territory (Italy), J. Maps, 2008, 451, 10.4113/jom.2008.1023 · DOI
  44. Fels, J.E., Matson, K.C., 1996. A cognitively based approach for hydro-geomorphic land classification using digital terrain models. Third International Conference/Workshop on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling, Santa Fe, New Mexico, 21–25 January 1996, National Centre for Geographic Information and Analysis, Santa Barbara, CA (CD-ROM).
  45. Fenti, V., Silvano, S., Spagna, V., 1979. Methodological proposal for an engineering geomorphological map. Forecasting rockfalls in the Alps. IAEG Symposium on Engineering Geological Mapping for Planning, Design and Construction in Civil Engineering, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK, September 1979. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 2007, 134–138. · DOI
  46. Fisher, 2000, Sorites paradox and vague geographies, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 113, 7, 10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00009-3 · DOI
  47. Fisher, 2004, Where is Helvellyn? Multiscale morphometry and the mountains of the English Lake District, Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 29, 106, 10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00117.x · DOI
  48. Fisher, 2007, Higher order vagueness in a dynamic landscape: multi-resolution morphometric analysis of a coastal dunefield, J. Environ. Inform., 9, 56, 10.3808/jei.200700087 · DOI
  49. Fookes, 1997, Geology for engineers: the geological model, prediction and performance, Q. J. Eng. Geol., 30, 293, 10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1997.030.P4.02 · DOI
  50. Franklin, 1987, Geomorphic processing of digital elevation models, Comput. Geosci., 13, 603, 10.1016/0098-3004(87)90030-6 · DOI
  51. Gilewska, 1967, Different methods of showing the relief on the detailed geomorphological maps, Z. Geomorphol. N.F., 11, 481
  52. Gosse, 2007, Cosmogenic nuclide dating: overview, 409, 10.1016/B0-444-52747-8/00067-3 · DOI
  53. Graff, 1993, Automated classification of generic terrain features in digital elevation models, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 59, 1407
  54. Griffiths, 1986, The role of geomorphological and geological techniques in a preliminary site investigation, vol. 2, 261
  55. Guida, 1996, Unità territoriale di riferimento per la pianificazione ambientale: esempi a diversa scala nell’area di Monte Bulgheria (Cilento, Campania), Geologia Tecnica e Ambientale, 3, 1
  56. Guida, D., De Pippo, T., Cestari, A., Siervo, V., Valente, A., 2009. Applications of the hierarchic GIS-based geomorphological mapping system. In: Marchetti, M., Soldati, M. (Eds.), The Role of Geomorphology in Land Management, Abstract Volume, Third AIGEO National Conference, 13–18 September, Modena, Italy, pp. 109–110.
  57. Gustavsson, M., 2005. Development of a Detailed Geomorphological Mapping System and GIS Geodatabase in Sweden. Licentiate Thesis, May 2005, Uppsala University, Sweden.
  58. Gustavsson, 2009, New geomorphological mapping system used at different scales in a Swedish glaciated area, Geomorphology, 110, 37, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.12.022 · DOI
  59. Gustavsson, 2006, A new symbol-and-GIS based detailed geomorphological mapping system: renewal of a scientific discipline for understanding landscape development, Geomorphology, 77, 90, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.026 · DOI
  60. Haigh, 1987, The holon hierarchy theory and landscape research, Catena, 10, 181
  61. Heil, R.J., 1980. The digital terrain model as a data base for hydrological and geomorphological analysis. Auto-Carto IV, vol. II. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Cartography and Computing: Applications in Health and Environment. Reston, VA, American Congress on Surveying and Mapping. American Society of Photogrammetry. Falls Church, VA, pp. 132–139.
  62. Howard, 1994, Modeling fluvial erosion on regional to continental scales, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 13971, 10.1029/94JB00744 · DOI
  63. Howard, 1980, Phyto-geomorphic classification of landscape, Geoforum, 11, 85, 10.1016/0016-7185(80)90001-9 · DOI
  64. Joly, F., Tricart, J., 1970. Légende pour la carte géomorphologique de la France au 1:50.000, vol. 77. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, 78 pp.
  65. Jones, 2000, Late quaternary sediment sources, storage and transfers within mountain basins using clast lithological analysis: Pineta Basin, central Pyrenees, Spain, Geomorphology, 34, 145, 10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00004-0 · DOI
  66. Kienholz, 1978, Maps of geomorphology and natural hazards of Grindelwald, Switzerland: scale 1:10,000, Arct. Antarct. Alp. Res., 10, 169, 10.1080/00040851.1978.12003957 · DOI
  67. Klimaszewski, 1956, The principles of the geomorphological survey of Poland, Przegl. Geogr., 28, 32
  68. Klimaszewski, 1982, Detailed geomorphological maps, ITC J., 1982–3, 265
  69. Klimaszewski, 1990, Thirty years of geomorphological mapping, Geogr. Pol., 58, 11
  70. Kneisel, 1998, Legende für geomorphologische kartierungen in Hochgebirgen (GMK Hochgebirge), Trierer Geographische Studien, 18, 7
  71. Lavé, 2001, Fluvial incision and tectonic uplift across the Himalayas of Central Nepal, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 26561, 10.1029/2001JB000359 · DOI
  72. Leoni, 2009, GIS methodology to assess landslide susceptibility: application to a river catchment of Central Italy, J. Maps, 2009, 87, 10.4113/jom.2009.1041 · DOI
  73. Linton, D.L., 1951. The delimitation of morphological regions. In: Stamp, L.D., Wooldridge, S.W. (Eds.), London Essays in Geography, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 41(3), pp. 199–218. · DOI
  74. Maarleveld, 1974, Die geomorphologische karte der Niederlande, Z. Geomorphol. N.F., 18, 484, 10.1127/zfg/18/1974/484 · DOI
  75. Macar, 1961, Travaux préparatoires à l’èlaboration d’une carte géomorphologique de Belgique, Annales del la Societé Géologique de Belgique, 84, 179
  76. MacMillan, R.A., McNabb, D.H., Jones, R.K., 2000a. Automated landform classification using DEMs: a conceptual framework for a multi-level, hierarchy of hydrologically and geomorphologically oriented physiographic mapping units. Fourth International Conference on Integrating GIS and Environmental Modeling – Problems, Prospects and Research Needs. GIS/EM4, Banff, Alberta, Canada, September 2000. <http://www.colorado.edu/research/cires/banff/pubpapers/198/>.
  77. MacMillan, 2000, A generic procedure for automatically segmenting landforms into landform elements using DEMs, heuristic rules and fuzzy logic, Fuzzy Sets Syst., 113, 81, 10.1016/S0165-0114(99)00014-7 · DOI
  78. Meijerink, 1988, Data acquisition and data capture through terrain mapping unit, ITC J., 1, 23
  79. Merritts, 1989, Geomorphic response of coastal streams to low, intermediate and high rates of uplift. Mendocino triple junction region, northern California, Geol. Soc. Am. Bull., 101, 1373, 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<1373:GROCST>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  80. Minàr, 2008, Elementary forms for land surface segmentation: the theoretical basis of terrain analysis and geomorphological mapping, Geomorphology, 95, 236, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2007.06.003 · DOI
  81. Molenaar, 1989, Single valued vector maps. A concept in Geographic Information Systems, GIS, 2, 18
  82. Montgomery, 2002, Topographic controls on erosion rates in tectonically active mountain ranges, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 201, 481, 10.1016/S0012-821X(02)00725-2 · DOI
  83. Nichols, G., 2009. Sedimentology and Stratigraphy, second ed. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.
  84. North American Commission on Stratigraphic Nomenclature, 1983, North American stratigraphic code, Am. Assoc. Pet. Geol. Bull., 67, 841
  85. Pain, 1985, Mapping of landforms from Landsat imagery: an example from New South Wales, Australia, Remote Sens. Environ., 17, 55, 10.1016/0034-4257(85)90112-9 · DOI
  86. Panizza, 1972, Schema di legenda per carte geomorfologiche di dettaglio, Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana, 91, 207
  87. Panizza, 1973, Proposta di legenda per carte di stabilità geomorfologica, Bollettino della Società Geologica Italiana, 92, 303
  88. Panizza, 1978, Analysis and mapping of geomorphological processes in environmental management, Geoforum, 9, 1, 10.1016/0016-7185(78)90020-9 · DOI
  89. Parise, 2001, Landslide mapping techniques and their use in the assessment of the landslide hazard, Phys. Chem. Earth C, 26, 697
  90. Passarge, S., 1914. Morphologischer Atlas. Lieferung I: Morphologie des Messtiscb lattes Stadtremda. Mittelungen der Geographischen Gesellschaft, Hamburg. · DOI
  91. Pereira, 2002, A typology of spatial and temporal relations, Geogr. Anal., 34, 21, 10.1353/geo.2002.0005 · DOI
  92. Petley, 1998, Geomorphological mapping for hazard assessment in neotectonic terrain, Geogr. J., 164, 183, 10.2307/3060369 · DOI
  93. Rao, 2002, Remote sensing application in geomorphology, Trop. Ecol., 43, 49
  94. Rose, 2008, Glacial geomorphological maps of the Glasgow region, western central Scotland, J. Maps, 2008, 399, 10.4113/jom.2008.1040 · DOI
  95. Salomé, 1982, A comparison of geomorphological mapping systems, ITC J., 1982–3, 272
  96. Sauro, 1977, Propositions pour une cartographie morphologique à grande échelle des champs de lapiés, Studi Trentini di Scienze Naturali, 54, 163
  97. Savigear, 1965, A technique of morphological mapping, Ann. Am. Assoc. Geogr., 55, 514, 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1965.tb00532.x · DOI
  98. Schiewe, 2001, Potential and problems of multi-scale segmentation methods in remote sensing, GIS – Geo-Informationssysteme, 6, 34
  99. Schmidt, 2004, Fuzzy land element classification from DTMs based on geometry and terrain position, Geoderma, 121, 243, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2003.10.008 · DOI
  100. Schneevoigt, 2008, Detecting Alpine landforms from remotely sensed imagery. A pilot study in the Bavarian Alps, Geomorphology, 93, 104, 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.12.034 · DOI
  101. Schumm, 1965, Time, space and casuality in geomorphology, Am. J. Sci., 263, 110, 10.2475/ajs.263.2.110 · DOI
  102. Seelbach, P.W., Wiley, M.J., Kotanchik, J.C., Baker, M.E., 1997. A landscape-based ecological classification system for river valley segments in lower Michigan (MI-VSEC Version 1). Fisheries Division Research Report 2036, Department of Natural Resources, State of Michigan, Lansing, USA.
  103. Seijmonsbergen, A.C., Hengl, T., Anders, N.S., in press. Automated mapping. In: Smith, M.J., Paron, P., Griffiths, J. (Eds.), Geomorphological Mapping: A Handbook of Techniques and Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  104. Smith, M.J., in press. Digital mapping. In: Smith, M.J., Paron, P., Griffiths, J. (Eds.), Geomorphological Mapping: A Handbook of Techniques and Applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam. · DOI
  105. Smith, 2009, Applications of remote sensing in geomorphology, Prog. Phys. Geogr., 33, 568, 10.1177/0309133309346648 · DOI
  106. Ten Cate, 1983, Detailed systematic geomorphological mapping in the Netherlands and its applications, Geologie en Mijnbouw, 62, 611
  107. Ten Cate, 1990, Sea-level rise and geomorphological mapping, Geogr. Pol., 58, 19
  108. Tricart, J., 1969. Cartographic aspects of geomorphological surveys in relation to development programs. World Cartography, vol. 9, U.N. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, pp. 75–83.
  109. Ulaby, 1975, Classification of physiography from ERTS imagery, Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens., 41, 1019
  110. van Westen, 2008, Spatial data for landslide susceptibility, hazards and vulnerability assessment: an overview, Eng. Geol., 102, 112, 10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.010 · DOI
  111. van Zuidam, 1982, Consideration on systematic medium-scale geomorphological mapping, Z. Geomorphol. N.F., 26, 473, 10.1127/zfg/26/1982/473 · DOI
  112. Verstappen, 1970, Introduction to the ITC system of geomorphological survey. Koninlijk Nederlands Aardrijkkundig Genootschap, Geografisch Nieuwe Reeks, 4, 85
  113. Voženílek, 2000, Spatial database for geomorphological mapping by GPS techniques, Geographica, 36, 97
  114. Wakamatsu, K., Matsuoka, M., Kubo, S., Hasegawa, K., Sugiura, M., 2002. A nationwide gis-based engineering geomorphological map and site characteristics of K-net and Kik-net stations. Proceedings of the Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, September 2002, Tokyo, Japan, vol. 11, pp. 47–52.
  115. Wandres, 2004, Provenance analysis using conglomerate clast lithologies: a case study from the Pahau terrane of New Zealand, Sediment. Geol., 167, 57, 10.1016/j.sedgeo.2004.02.002 · DOI
  116. Watchman, 2002, Relative and ‘absolute’ dating of land surfaces, Earth Sci. Rev., 58, 1, 10.1016/S0012-8252(01)00080-0 · DOI
  117. Whipple, 1999, Geomorphic limits to climate-induced increases in topographic relief, Nature, 401, 39, 10.1038/43375 · DOI
  118. Wielemaker, 2001, Significance and application of the multi-hierarchical landsystem in soil mapping, Catena, 43, 15, 10.1016/S0341-8162(00)00121-1 · DOI
  119. Winchester, 2000, Dendrochronology and lichenometry: colonization, growth rates and dating of geomorphological events on the east side of the North Patagonian Icefield, Chile, Geomorphology, 34, 181, 10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00006-4 · DOI
  120. Wu, 1999, Hierarchy and scaling: extrapolating information along a scaling ladder, Can. J. Remote Sens., 5, 367, 10.1080/07038992.1999.10874736 · DOI
  121. Zhu, 1999, A personal construct-based knowledge acquisition process for natural resource mapping, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci., 13, 119, 10.1080/136588199241382 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Dramis, F., Guida, D., & Cestari, A.
Venue
Developments in Earth Surface Processes
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2011
Pages
39-73
ISSN
0928-2025
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-444-53446-0.00003-3
Cited by
76
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review