The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Use of Advanced Educational Technologies in a Process Simulation Course
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Simulation-supported learning presents a risk that students may rely on simulator outputs without sufficiently articulating the governing principles, assumptions, and causal mechanisms underlying those outputs.
“However, simulation-supported learning also presents a well-recognized risk: students may rely on simulator outputs without sufficiently articulating the governing principles, assumptions, and causal mechanisms underlying those outputs.”
From Comparing predictive, simulation-based and hybrid assessments in undergraduate process engineering (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Cutlip, 2009, Chem. Eng. Ed, 43, 243
- Dahm, 2002, Chem. Eng. Ed, 36, 192
- Eisenberg, 2006, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 19, 754, 10.1016/j.jlp.2006.07.002 · DOI
- Rockstraw, 2005, Chem. Eng. Ed, 39, 68
- Shacham, 1986, International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, 23, 1455, 10.1002/nme.1620230805 · DOI
- Shacham, 2009, Chem. Eng. Ed, 43, 299
- Streicher, 2005, Chem. Eng. Ed, 39, 288
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Comparing predictive, simulation-based and hybrid assessments in undergraduate process engineering
Jafary, T., Pheiffer, L., Al Maqbali, H., Yeneneh, A. M., & Benayoune, A. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-01525-7
Metadata
- Authors
- Shacham, M.
- Venue
- Computer Aided Chemical Engineering
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 1135-1139
- ISSN
- 1570-7946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1608510823
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 1.53
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Computer-aided chemical engineering/Computer aided chemical engineering (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Experimental Learning in Engineering
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Pedagogy
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Keywords
- MATLAB, thermodynamic correlations, steady-state simulation, dynamic simulation, numerical integration, chemical engineering curriculum, process modeling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
