How rod, cone, and melanopsin photoreceptors come together to enlighten the mammalian circadian clock
Abstract
In mammals, a small number of retinal ganglion cells express melanopsin, an opsin photopigment, allowing them to be directly photoreceptive. A major function of these so-called intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) is to synchronize (entrain) endogenous circadian clocks to the external light:dark cycle. Thanks to their intrinsic light response, ipRGCs can support photoentrainment even when the other retinal photoreceptors (rods and cones) are absent or inactive. However, in the intact retina the ipRGC light response is a composite of extrinsic (rod/cone) and intrinsic (melanopsin) influences. As a result all three photoreceptor classes contribute to the retinal pathways providing light information to the clock. Here, we consider what each photoreceptor type contributes to the clock light response. We review electrophysiological and behavioral data pertinent to this question, primarily from laboratory rodents, drawing them together to provide a conceptual model in which each photoreceptor class plays a distinct role in encoding the light environment. We finally use this model to highlight some of the important outstanding questions in this field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The transcriptional output time of the molecular clock in the SCN is set to exactly 24-h by retinal light input.
“The transcriptional output time of the molecular clock in the SCN is set to exactly 24-h by retinal light input, the most important timing cue (Zeitgeber) to synchronize this central clock with the environment [4].”
From Circadian control of glucose metabolism (2014) · cites this paper as [4]
In mammals, light detection requires the retina and occurs via melanopsin-positive retinal ganglion cells working in conjunction with rod and cone cells.
“In mammals, light detection requires the retina and occurs via melanopsinpositive retinal ganglion cells working in conjunction with the rod and cone cells (15).”
From Circadian rhythms, metabolism, and chrononutrition in rodents and humans (2016) · cites this paper as [15]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 78 · Cited by 195
- Authors
- Lucas, R. J., Lall, G. S., Allen, A. E., & Brown, T. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Manchester (GB)
- Medway School of Pharmacy (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Lucas, Robert J.
- Venue
- Progress in brain research
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 199
- Pages
- 1-18
- ISSN
- 0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1574656550
- Cited by
- 195
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9
- FWCI
- 12.89
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Keywords
- circadian clock, melanopsin, intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, rod photoreceptors, cone photoreceptors, light entrainment, light-dark cycle, retinal photoreceptors, circadian photoreception
- MeSH terms
- Melanopsin, Animals, Humans, Light, Rod Opsins, Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells, Retinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells, Circadian Clocks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review