The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Editors’ Introduction
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The study design required students to opt out rather than opt in to the intervention, which heightened confidence in the results by reducing self-selection.
“Confidence in our results is heightened by the fact that the study design required students to opt out, rather than requiring them to opt in, to the intervention.”
From Thx 4 the msg: Assessing the Impact of Texting on Student Engagement and Persistence (2022) · cites this paper as Hanushek et al., 2016
Behavioral economics suggests students often make decisions that provide immediate gratification over those that will positively impact their futures.
“behavioral economics suggests students often make decisions that provide immediate gratification over those that will positively impact their futures (Hanushek et al., 2016).”
From Thx 4 the msg: Assessing the Impact of Texting on Student Engagement and Persistence (2022) · cites this paper as Hanushek et al., 2016
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hanushek, 2011, The economics of international differences in educational achievement, vol. 3
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thx 4 the msg: Assessing the Impact of Texting on Student Engagement and Persistence
Tippetts, M. M., Davis, B., Nalbone, S., & Zick, C. D. (2022) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s11162-022-09678-8 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Hanushek, E. A., Machin, S., & Woessmann, L.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- University College London (GB)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Venue
- Handbook of the Economics of Education
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2016
- Pages
- xiii-xiv
- ISSN
- 1574-0692 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4239310967
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Handbook of the economics of education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Politics, Economics, and Education Policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
