Cited by 123Logic, Reasoning, and KnowledgeAI-based Problem Solving and PlanningLogic, programming, and type systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Explanation-Based Generalization as Resolution Theorem Proving

KEDAR-CABELLI, SMADAR T., MCCARTY, L. THORNE·1987·Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on MACHINE LEARNING

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-934613-41-5.50041-6

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Kedar-Cabelli, S. T. (1987). Investigations into purpose-directed analogy. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, (in progress).
  2. Minton, S. (1987). Acquiring search control knowledge: An explanation-based approach. Doctoral dissertation, Computer Science Department, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, (in progress).
  3. Sims, M. (June 1987). Analytic and Empirical Discovery in IL. Proceedings of the Fourth International Machine Learning Workshop. University of California at Irvine, Morgan Kaufmann.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 123

Metadata

Authors
KEDAR-CABELLI, S. T., & MCCARTY, L. T.
Affiliations
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
  • KEDAR-CABELLI, SMADAR T.
  • MCCARTY, L. THORNE
Venue
Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on MACHINE LEARNING
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1987
Pages
383-389
OpenAlex
W1581847324
Cited by
123
References
7
Citations by year
2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
14.34
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Software › Logic, programming, and type systems
Keywords
explanation-based generalization, resolution theorem proving, Horn clause logic, inductive generalization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review