Brief Cognitive Assessment of Children: Review of Instruments and Recommendations for Best Practice
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The PPVT-4 provides an index of relatively crystallized knowledge and is often used as a proxy for full scale IQ or general developmental level.
“As a test of receptive vocabulary, the PPVT-4 provides an index of relatively crystallized knowledge, and is often used as a proxy for full scale IQ or general developmental level (Kline, 2001).”
From NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of Executive Function Measures in Adults (2014) · cites this paper as Kline, 2001
Cited by
Sorted by citations
NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of Executive Function Measures in Adults
Zelazo, P. D., Anderson, J. E., Richler, J., Wallner-Allen, K., Beaumont, J. L., Conway, K. P., Gershon, R., & Weintraub, S. (2014) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617714000472 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
- Authors
- KLINE, R. B.
- Affiliations
- Concordia University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- KLINE, REX B.
- ORCID
- KLINE, REX B.
- Venue
- Handbook of Psychoeducational Assessment
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2001
- Pages
- 103-132
- OpenAlex
- W2476412430
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 2.30
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- brief cognitive assessment, children, cognitive assessment tools, best practice recommendations, neuropsychological assessment, child cognitive function
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review