Cited by 8Developmental and Educational NeuropsychologyPsychological Testing and AssessmentCognitive Abilities and Testing

Brief Cognitive Assessment of Children: Review of Instruments and Recommendations for Best Practice

KLINE, REX B.·2001·Handbook of Psychoeducational Assessment

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-012058570-0/50006-9

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The PPVT-4 provides an index of relatively crystallized knowledge and is often used as a proxy for full scale IQ or general developmental level.

    “As a test of receptive vocabulary, the PPVT-4 provides an index of relatively crystallized knowledge, and is often used as a proxy for full scale IQ or general developmental level (Kline, 2001).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KLINE, R. B.
Affiliations
Concordia University (CA)
Corresponding author
KLINE, REX B.
Venue
Handbook of Psychoeducational Assessment
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2001
Pages
103-132
OpenAlex
W2476412430
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.30
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
brief cognitive assessment, children, cognitive assessment tools, best practice recommendations, neuropsychological assessment, child cognitive function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review