WISC-IV Integrated
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cognitive tests are comprised of related constructs and many subtests will have moderate to high correlations with each other.
“Cognitive tests are comprised of related constructs (Holdnack & Weiss, 2006; Tulsky & Price, 2003) and many of the subtests will have moderate to high correlations with each other.”
From Using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (NIHTB-CB) in individuals with traumatic brain injury. (2017) · cites this paper as Holdnack & Weiss, 2006
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 39 · Cited by 18
- Authors
- Holdnack, J. A., & Weiss, L. G.
- ORCID
- Holdnack, James A.
- Venue
- WISC-IV Advanced Clinical Interpretation
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2006
- Pages
- 201-274
- OpenAlex
- W2477549320
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Keywords
- intellectual functioning, process approach, cognitive skills, attention, auditory processing, language skills, test development, clinical interpretation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
