The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Computational Electromagnetics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yee, K. (1966) · IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · doi:10.1109/tap.1966.1138693 · Cited by 15,008
Mur, G. (1981) · IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · doi:10.1109/temc.1981.303970 · Cited by 2,565
Cited by
Meep: A flexible free-software package for electromagnetic simulations by the FDTD method
Oskooi, A. F., Roundy, D., Ibanescu, M., Bermel, P., Joannopoulos, J. D., & Johnson, S. G. (2010) · Computer Physics Communications · doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.11.008 · Cited by 2,747
Nanodome Solar Cells with Efficient Light Management and Self-Cleaning
Zhu, J., Hsu, C.-M., Yu, Z., Fan, S., & Cui, Y. (2010) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl9034237 · Cited by 873
Electromagnetic Mechanism of SERS
Schatz, G. C., Young, M. A., & Duyne, R. P. (2006) · Topics in Applied Physics · doi:10.1007/3-540-33567-6_2 · Cited by 469
Plasmonics in the ultraviolet with the poor metals Al, Ga, In, Sn, Tl, Pb, and Bi
McMahon, J. M., Schatz, G. C., & Gray, S. K. (2013) · Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · doi:10.1039/c3cp43856b · Cited by 371
Enhancement of Light Extraction from Light Emitting Diodes
Zhmakin, A. I. (2011) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2010.11.001 · Cited by 312
Metadata
- Authors
- Taflove, A., Hagness, S. C., & Piket-May, M.
- Venue
- The Electrical Engineering Handbook
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2005
- Pages
- 629-670
- OpenAlex
- W145066576
- Cited by
- 1,514
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 391.69
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Computational Electromagnetics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/b978-012170960-0/50046-3
- The paper
- Taflove, A., Hagness, S. C., & Piket-May, M. (2005). Computational Electromagnetics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method. The Electrical Engineering Handbook. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012170960-0/50046-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
