Cognition, Memory, and Education
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Spaced learning is more effective than massed learning for facts, concepts and lists, skill and motor learning, classroom education including science and vocabulary learning, and generalization of conceptual knowledge in children.
“For example, spaced learning is more effective than massed learning for facts, concepts and lists2–4, skill learning and motor learning5,6, in classroom education (including science learning and vocabulary learning)7–9, and in generalization of conceptual knowledge in children10.”
From The right time to learn: Mechanisms and optimization of spaced learning (2016) · cites this paper as [8]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 133 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- McDaniel, M. A., & Callender, A. A.
- Affiliations
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2008
- Pages
- 819-843
- OpenAlex
- W76412792
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 133
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 3.08
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- memory, comprehension, elaboration, desirable difficulties, transfer-appropriate processing, individual differences, inferencing, textual revision, retrieval practice, retesting, elaborative interrogation, advance organizers, spacing effect, generation effect, interference, contextualism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
