Depression and anxiety in supportive oncology
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Emotional disturbances are common in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, with anxiety peaking at diagnosis and recurrence and depression becoming more common with disease progression and proximity to death.
“Emotional disturbances are common in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer, with anxiety peaking at the time of diagnosis and again at recurrence and with depression becoming more common with disease progression and proximity to death. 1,2”
From Managing cancer and living meaningfully (CALM): Randomised feasibility trial in patients with advanced cancer (2019) · cites this paper as [1]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 127 · Cited by 32
- Authors
- Li, M., Boquiren, V., Lo, C., & Rodin, G.
- Venue
- Supportive Oncology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2011
- Pages
- 528-540
- OpenAlex
- W2503801831
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 127
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Keywords
- depression, anxiety, emotional distress, cancer, cancer supportive care, psychological distress, stressors, depressive disorders, anxiety disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
