The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998) · Analysis · doi:10.1093/analys/58.1.7 · Cited by 6,333
The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model.
Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.550 · Cited by 2,152
Self-citationForward models: supervised learning with a distal teacher
Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1992) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1603_1 · Cited by 1,451
Self-citationSituated simulation in the human conceptual system
Barsalou, L. (2003) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690960344000026 · Cited by 979
Metadata
- Authors
- RUMELHART, D. E., SMOLENSKY, P., McCLELLAND, J. L., & HINTON, G. E.
- Venue
- Readings in Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1988
- Pages
- 224-249
- OpenAlex
- W1506514354
- Cited by
- 626
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 46.61
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50020-0
- The paper
- RUMELHART, D. E., SMOLENSKY, P., McCLELLAND, J. L., & HINTON, G. E. (1988). Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models. Readings in Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-1-4832-1446-7.50020-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
