Cited by 3Medical Practices and RehabilitationPsychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health and Patient Involvement

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Introduction Où en est la réhabilitation psychosociale en France ?

Franck, Nicolas·2018·Traité de Réhabilitation Psychosociale

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-2-294-75915-4.10000-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. Amado, 2016, Implementing cognitive remediation programs in France : The "secret sauce", Psychiatric Services, 67, 707, 10.1176/appi.ps.201600033 · DOI
  2. Bon, 2018, The impact of cognitive remediation on cerebral activity in schizophrenia : a systematic review
  3. Bonsack, 2016, Linking primary and secondary care after psychiatric hospitalization : Comparison between transitional case management setting and routine care for common mental disorders, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7, 96, 10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00096 · DOI
  4. Bousquet, 2016, Panorama des dépenses de psychiatrie en France, Revue française des affaires sociales, 2, 31, 10.3917/rfas.162.0031 · DOI
  5. Drukker, 2014, Can assertive community treatment remedy patients dropping out of treatment due to fragmented services?, Community Mental Health Journal, 50, 454, 10.1007/s10597-013-9652-0 · DOI
  6. Fleury, 2016, Severity of needs among individuals withseveremental disorders : Changes after a five-year follow-up, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 204, 132, 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000441 · DOI
  7. Gaebel, 2016, EuropeanPsychiatricAssociation (EPA) guidance on the quality of Mentalhealth interventions in the treatment of psychoticdisorders, European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 266, 125, 10.1007/s00406-016-0677-6 · DOI
  8. Hastrup, 2015, Costs and outcome of assertive community treatment (ACT) in a rural area in Denmark : 4-year register-based follow-up, Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 69, 110, 10.3109/08039488.2014.936500 · DOI
  9. Knapp, 1997, The cost consequences of changing the hospital-community balance : The mental health residential care study, Psychological Medicine, 27, 681, 10.1017/S0033291796004667 · DOI
  10. Marshall, 2011, Assertive community treatment for people withseveremental disorders, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4
  11. Medalia, 2017, Why cognitive health matters, AJPH Perspectives, 107, 45
  12. Moock, 2014, Support from the Internet for individuals with mental disorders : Advantages and disadvantages of e-mental health service delivery, Frontiers in Public Health, 2, 65, 10.3389/fpubh.2014.00065 · DOI
  13. Morin, 2017, Rehabilitation interventions to promote recovery in schizophrenia : A systematic review, Frontiers in Psychiatry, 8, 100, 10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00100 · DOI
  14. OCDE, 2015, Psychiatric care beds, OECD iLibray.
  15. Olsø, 2016, More than just a bed : Mental health service users' experiences of self-referral admission, International Journal of Mental Health Systems, 10, 11, 10.1186/s13033-016-0045-y · DOI
  16. Perälä, 2007, Lifetime prevalence of psychotic and bipolar I disorders in a general population, Archives of General Psychiatry, 64, 19, 10.1001/archpsyc.64.1.19 · DOI
  17. Quirk, 2001, What do we know about life on acute psychiatric wards in the UK? A review of the research evidence, Social Science & Medicine, 53, 1565, 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00457-3 · DOI
  18. Robotham, 2015, Electronic personal health records for people withseveremental illness : A feasibility study, BMC Psychiatry, 15, 192, 10.1186/s12888-015-0558-y · DOI
  19. Salisbury, 2008, An international comparison of the deinstitutionalization of mental health care : Development and findings of the Mental Health Services Deinstitutionalisation Measure (MENDit), BMC Psychiatry, 16, 54, 10.1186/s12888-016-0762-4 · DOI
  20. Thornicroft, 2004, Components of a modern mental health service : A pragmatic balance of community and hospital care : Overview of systematic evidence, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 185, 283, 10.1192/bjp.185.4.283 · DOI
  21. Thornicroft, 2013, The balanced care model for global mental health, The British Journal of Psychiatry, 202, 246, 10.1192/bjp.bp.112.111377 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Franck, N.
Venue
Traité de Réhabilitation Psychosociale
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2018
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W2808006899
Cited by
3
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.32
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Keywords
psychosocial rehabilitation, mental health services, mental illness, France

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review