Behavioral development economics
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a consequence, the harvest study cannot fully rule out time trends or potential learning effects.
“As a consequence, this study cannot fully rule out time trends or potential learning effects (Kremer et al. 2019; Wicherts and Zand Scholten 2013).”
From Poverty and economic decision making: a review of scarcity theory (2022) · cites this paper as Kremer et al. 2019
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 378 · Cited by 188
- Authors
- Kremer, M., Rao, G., & Schilbach, F.
- Affiliations
- National Bureau of Economic Research (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kremer, Michael
- Venue
- Handbook of Behavioral Economics: Applications and Foundations 1
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 345-458
- ISSN
- 2352-2399 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2911212090
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 378
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 106.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Handbook of behavioral economics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Social Sciences › Demography › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Keywords
- present bias, loss aversion, social preferences, non-Bayesian learning, limited attention, mental accounting, default effects, profit maximization, psychology of poverty, cognitive function, savings, insurance, technology adoption, labor market, preventive medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
