Recent Trends in Nanotechnology Toward CNS Diseases
Abstract
Central nervous system (CNS) diseases constitute a set of challenging pathological conditions concerning diagnosis and therapeutics. For most of these disorders, there is a lack of early diagnosis, biomarkers to allow proper follow-up of disease progression and effective therapeutic strategies to allow a persistent cure. The poor prognosis of most CNS diseases is, therefore, a global concern, especially regarding chronic age-related neurodegenerative disorders, which are already considered problems of public health due to the increasing average of life expectancy. The difficulties associated with the treatment of CNS diseases are owed, at least in part, to very specific characteristics of the brain and spinal cord, when compared to peripheral organs. In this regard, the CNS is physically and chemically protected by the blood-brain barrier (BBB), which, while maintaining essential brain homeostasis, significantly restricts the delivery of most therapeutic agents to the brain parenchyma. On the other hand, regenerative properties of the tissue are lacking, meaning that a CNS insult resulting in neuronal death is a permanent phenomenon. Approaches for transposing the BBB aiming to treat CNS diseases, relying on specific properties of nanosystems, have been reported for therapeutic delivery to CNS without interfering with the normal function of the brain. In this chapter, we address the latest advances concerning the principles of such approaches, employing lipid-based nanoparticles and cell-produced exosomes as drug and nucleic acid delivery systems, and summarize recent example of applications in the context of neurological diseases. Major achievements obtained in preclinical studies and the trends identified by these studies are emphasized to provide new prospects for further developments in this area, thus enabling us to move from the research realm to the clinical arena.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The integration of EVs with nanomaterials represents a frontier in CNS nanotheranostics, offering novel solutions for drug delivery, therapeutic efficacy, and disease diagnosis in the brain.
“The integration of EVs with nanomaterials represents a frontier in CNS nanotheranostics, offering novel solutions for the challenges of drug delivery, therapeutic efficacy, and disease diagnosis in the brain [229, 230].”
From Extracellular vesicles as nanotheranostic platforms for targeted neurological disorder interventions (2024) · cites this paper as [230]
Cites
Factors regulating microglia activation
Kierdorf, K., & Prinz, M. (2013) · Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncel.2013.00044 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Exciting, Radical, Suicidal: How Brain Cells Die After Stroke
Lo, E. H., Moskowitz, M. A., & Jacobs, T. P. (2005) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.0000153069.96296.fd · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Costa, P. M., Cardoso, A. L., Nóbrega, C., Pereira de Almeida, L. F., Bruce, J. N., Canoll, P., & Pedroso de Lima, M. C. (2013) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/dds496 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationAvnir, Y., Turjeman, K., Tulchinsky, D., Sigal, A., Kizelsztein, P., Tzemach, D., Gabizon, A., & Barenholz, Y. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025721 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Extracellular vesicles as nanotheranostic platforms for targeted neurological disorder interventions
Choi, H. K., Chen, M., Goldston, L. L., & Lee, K.-B. (2024) · Nano Convergence · doi:10.1186/s40580-024-00426-5 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cardoso, A. M., Guedes, J. R., Cardoso, A. L., Morais, C., Cunha, P., Viegas, A. T., Costa, R., Jurado, A., & Pedroso de Lima, M. C.
- Affiliations
- Centro de Neurociências e Biologia Celular (PT)
- Venue
- International Review of Neurobiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 130
- Pages
- 1-40
- ISSN
- 0074-7742 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2472484749
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International review of neurobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
- Keywords
- central nervous system disorders, blood-brain barrier, nanomedicine, lipid nanoparticles, exosomes, nucleic acid delivery, brain drug delivery, neurodegenerative diseases, neuroprotection, biomarkers
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Central Nervous System Diseases, Humans, Lipids, Drug Delivery Systems, Nanotechnology, Nanoparticles, Exosomes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review