Human Activity and Rest In Situ
Abstract
Our lives are structured by the daily alternation of activity and rest, of wake and sleep. Despite significant advances in circadian and sleep research, we still lack answers to many of the most fundamental questions about this conspicuous behavioral pattern. We strongly believe that investigating this pattern in entrained conditions, real-life and daily contexts-in situ-will help the field to elucidate some of these central questions. Here, we present two common approaches for in situ investigation of human activity and rest: the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) and actimetry. In the first half of this chapter, we provide detailed instructions on how to use and interpret the MCTQ. In addition, we give an overview of the main insights gained with this instrument over the past 10 years, including some new findings on the interaction of light and age on sleep timing. In the second half of this chapter, we introduce the reader to the method of actimetry and share our experience in basic analysis techniques, including visualization, smoothing, and cosine model fitting of in situ recorded data. Additionally, we describe our new approach to automatically detect sleep from activity recordings. Our vision is that the broad use of such easy techniques in real-life settings combined with automated analyses will lead to the creation of large databases. The resulting power of big numbers will promote our understanding of such fundamental biological phenomena as sleep.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The age range was relatively narrow, representing an age group before significant shifts in chronotype become more pronounced.
“Finally, the age range was relatively narrow, representing an age group before significant shifts in chronotype (preference for evening or morning hours) become more pronounced.51”
From Screen Use at Bedtime and Sleep Duration and Quality Among Youths (2024) · cites this paper as [51]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 175
- Authors
- Roenneberg, T., Keller, L. K., Fischer, D., Matera, J. L., Vetter, C., & Winnebeck, E. C.
- Affiliations
- Institut für Medizinische Psychologie (DE)
- LMU Klinikum (DE)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roenneberg, Till
- Venue
- Methods in Enzymology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2015
- Volume
- 552
- Pages
- 257-283
- ISSN
- 0076-6879 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2413125116
- Cited by
- 175
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 34.02
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- circadian rhythm, sleep timing, Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, actigraphy, in situ recording, light exposure, chronotype
- MeSH terms
- Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review