Cited by 175Circadian rhythm and melatoninSleep and related disordersSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Human Activity and Rest In Situ

Roenneberg, Till, Keller, Lena K., Fischer, Dorothee, Matera, Joana L., Vetter, Céline, Winnebeck, Eva C.·2015·Methods in Enzymology

Abstract

Our lives are structured by the daily alternation of activity and rest, of wake and sleep. Despite significant advances in circadian and sleep research, we still lack answers to many of the most fundamental questions about this conspicuous behavioral pattern. We strongly believe that investigating this pattern in entrained conditions, real-life and daily contexts-in situ-will help the field to elucidate some of these central questions. Here, we present two common approaches for in situ investigation of human activity and rest: the Munich ChronoType Questionnaire (MCTQ) and actimetry. In the first half of this chapter, we provide detailed instructions on how to use and interpret the MCTQ. In addition, we give an overview of the main insights gained with this instrument over the past 10 years, including some new findings on the interaction of light and age on sleep timing. In the second half of this chapter, we introduce the reader to the method of actimetry and share our experience in basic analysis techniques, including visualization, smoothing, and cosine model fitting of in situ recorded data. Additionally, we describe our new approach to automatically detect sleep from activity recordings. Our vision is that the broad use of such easy techniques in real-life settings combined with automated analyses will lead to the creation of large databases. The resulting power of big numbers will promote our understanding of such fundamental biological phenomena as sleep.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.mie.2014.11.028

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The age range was relatively narrow, representing an age group before significant shifts in chronotype become more pronounced.

    “Finally, the age range was relatively narrow, representing an age group before significant shifts in chronotype (preference for evening or morning hours) become more pronounced.51”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 175

Authors
Roenneberg, T., Keller, L. K., Fischer, D., Matera, J. L., Vetter, C., & Winnebeck, E. C.
Affiliations
  • Institut für Medizinische Psychologie (DE)
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Roenneberg, Till
Venue
Methods in Enzymology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2015
Volume
552
Pages
257-283
ISSN
0076-6879 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2413125116
Cited by
175
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1
FWCI
34.02
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
circadian rhythm, sleep timing, Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, actigraphy, in situ recording, light exposure, chronotype
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sleep

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review