Cited by 12Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCalcium signaling and nucleotide metabolismUbiquitin and proteasome pathways

Cytofluorometric Assessment of Mitophagic Flux in Mammalian Cells and Tissues

Esteban-Martinez, L., Villarejo-Zori, B., Boya, P.·2017·Methods in Enzymology

Abstract

Mitophagy is the selective autophagic degradation of mitochondria inside lysosomes and is the only mechanism capable of eliminating whole mitochondria that are either damaged or no longer required. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a common hallmark in many pathological conditions and has been implicated in cellular damage in aged tissues. The limited availability of mitophagy research methods underscores the need for more robust, quantitative, and objective tools in order to better understand this process. Here we describe a flow cytometry-based method using MitoTracker Deep Red for mitophagy assessment that can be applied to cells and tissues. Moreover, we demonstrate that when used in conjunction with lysosomal inhibitors, our method provides a novel means of assessing mitophagic flux, which is the most reliable indicator of whether mitochondria are truly delivered to lysosomes for degradation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.09.081

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MitoTracker Deep Red fluorescence was significantly greater compared to MitoTracker Red in APOE4 astrocytes.

    “their fluorescence of MitoTracker Deep Red, which is less sensitive to MMP21,24,25, was significantly greater compared to MitoTracker Red (Fig. 5b)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Esteban-Martinez, L., Villarejo-Zori, B., & Boya, P.
Affiliations
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
Corresponding author
Boya, P.
Venue
Methods in Enzymology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2017
Volume
588
Pages
209-217
ISSN
0076-6879 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2570496512
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
FWCI
8.44
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
Keywords
mitophagy, mitochondrial degradation, lysosomal inhibitors, mitochondrial dysfunction, flow cytometry assay, lysosomes
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Cells, Cultured, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Mitochondria, Mitophagy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review