Cytofluorometric Assessment of Mitophagic Flux in Mammalian Cells and Tissues
Abstract
Mitophagy is the selective autophagic degradation of mitochondria inside lysosomes and is the only mechanism capable of eliminating whole mitochondria that are either damaged or no longer required. Mitochondrial dysfunction is a common hallmark in many pathological conditions and has been implicated in cellular damage in aged tissues. The limited availability of mitophagy research methods underscores the need for more robust, quantitative, and objective tools in order to better understand this process. Here we describe a flow cytometry-based method using MitoTracker Deep Red for mitophagy assessment that can be applied to cells and tissues. Moreover, we demonstrate that when used in conjunction with lysosomal inhibitors, our method provides a novel means of assessing mitophagic flux, which is the most reliable indicator of whether mitochondria are truly delivered to lysosomes for degradation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MitoTracker Deep Red fluorescence was significantly greater compared to MitoTracker Red in APOE4 astrocytes.
“their fluorescence of MitoTracker Deep Red, which is less sensitive to MMP21,24,25, was significantly greater compared to MitoTracker Red (Fig. 5b)”
From Altered mitochondrial dynamics and function in APOE4-expressing astrocytes (2020) · cites this paper as [21]
Cites
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).
Klionsky, D. J., Abdelmohsen, K., Abe, A., Abedin, M. J., Abeliovich, H., Acevedo Arozena, A., Adachi, H., Adams, C. M., Adams, P. D., Adeli, K., et al. (2016) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356 · Cited by 5,894 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Altered mitochondrial dynamics and function in APOE4-expressing astrocytes
Schmukler, E., Solomon, S., Simonovitch, S., Goldshmit, Y., Wolfson, E., Michaelson, D. M., & Pinkas-Kramarski, R. (2020) · Cell Death & Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-020-02776-4 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
- Authors
- Esteban-Martinez, L., Villarejo-Zori, B., & Boya, P.
- Affiliations
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Corresponding author
- Boya, P.
- ORCID
- Boya, P.
- Venue
- Methods in Enzymology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2017
- Volume
- 588
- Pages
- 209-217
- ISSN
- 0076-6879 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2570496512
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 8.44
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Physiology › Calcium signaling and nucleotide metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Keywords
- mitophagy, mitochondrial degradation, lysosomal inhibitors, mitochondrial dysfunction, flow cytometry assay, lysosomes
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cell Line, Cells, Cultured, Flow Cytometry, Humans, Mitochondria, Mitophagy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review