The Essential Persona Lifecycle: Your Guide to Building and Using Personas
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
None of the included studies explicitly followed an available guideline such as the Personas Lifecycle to guide, report, or review their Personas efforts.
“Overall, none of the studies explicitly followed an available guideline such as the Personas Lifecyle (Adlin and Pruitt, 2010) to guide, report, or review their Personas efforts.”
From Using Personas in the development of eHealth interventions for chronic pain: A scoping review and narrative synthesis (2023) · cites this paper as Adlin and Pruitt, 2010
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 20 · Cited by 216
- Authors
- Adlin, T., & Pruitt, J.
- Venue
- Elsevier eBooks
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2010
- OpenAlex
- W84115055
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 8.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Persona Design and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Keywords
- personas, persona creation, user-centered design, product development, user research, target customers, return on investment, user needs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
