A method for identifying rear-end collision risks using inductive loop detectors
Abstract
An innovative feature of this study is to firstly attempt to capture rear-end collision potentials from the analysis of inductive loop detector data. Signals collected from loops are applied for monitoring individual vehicle information on freeways to estimate safe stopping distances in car-following situations. An index to quantify the potential of rear-end collisions is derived, and further employed for developing criteria to evaluate levels of rear-end collision risks. The proposed methodology based on loop detector data enables to identify collision potentials in real time. It is believed that the index would be a valuable tool for operating agencies in developing various strategies and policies toward enhancements of traffic safety.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
SDI is a conflict measurement indicator based on the difference between the minimum stopping distance of the leading and following vehicles, and a conflict can be estimated if the stopping distance of the trailing vehicle is longer than the leading vehicle.
“SDI is a conflict measurement indicator based on the difference between the minimum stopping distance of the leading and following vehicles.If the stopping distance of the trailing vehicle is longer than the leading vehicle, it can be estimated that a conflict has occurred [49].”
From Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic (2024) · cites this paper as [49]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic
Kim, H., Ko, J., Oh, C., & Kim, S. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16229672 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“If the stopping distance of the trailing vehicle is longer than the leading vehicle, it can be estimated that a conflict has occurred [49].”
Self-citation
- Authors
- Oh, C., Park, S., & Ritchie, S. G.
- Affiliations
- Korea Transport Institute (KR)
- University of California, Irvine (US)
- Corresponding author
- Oh, Cheol
- Venue
- Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 295-301
- ISSN
- 0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990921456
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Transportation Systems and Logistics
- Keywords
- rear-end collision risk, inductive loop detectors, vehicle following, collision risk index, freeway traffic safety, road safety policy
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Traffic, Automobile Driving, Engineering, Environment Design, Humans, Mathematics, Risk Assessment, Motor Vehicles
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review