Cited by 286Traffic control and managementTraffic and Road SafetyEvacuation and Crowd Dynamics

Calibration and validation of simulated vehicle safety performance at signalized intersections

Cunto, Flávio, Saccomanno, Frank F.·2008·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

A systematic procedure is presented for calibrating and validating a microscopic model of safety performance. The context in the model application is the potential for rear-end crashes at signalized intersections. VISSIM v.4.3 provides the simulation platform for estimating the safety performance for individual vehicles and has been calibrated and validated using separate samples of observed vehicle tracking data extracted from the FHWA/NGSIM program. The calibration exercise involves four sequential steps: (1) heuristic selection of initial model inputs, (2) statistical screening using a Plackett-Burnman design, (3) fractional factorial analysis relating inputs to safety performance, and (4) genetic algorithm procedure for obtaining best estimate input values. Three measures of safety performance were considered: crash potential index, number of vehicles in conflict and total conflict duration per vehicle. Model consistency was assessed by comparing simulated and observed safety performance based on a separate validation sample of vehicle tracking data. The suggested procedure was found to effectively estimate model input parameters that closely matched safety performance measures in the observed validation data. This procedure yields an objective and efficient means for simulation model calibration applied for estimating safety performance at signalized intersections.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2008.01.003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CPI is the probability that the DRAC of the following vehicle is greater than the vehicle's specific maximum deceleration in a vehicle following situation.

    “In addition, CPI is the probability that the DRAC of the following vehicle is greater than the vehicles specific maximum deceleration in a vehicle following situation [51].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cunto, F., & Saccomanno, F. F.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Cunto, Flávio
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-05
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
1171-1179
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067173632
Cited by
286
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Ocean Engineering › Evacuation and Crowd Dynamics
Keywords
microscopic traffic simulation, VISSIM, simulation calibration, model validation, signalized intersections, rear-end collisions, vehicle tracking data, NGSIM, genetic algorithm, conflict duration, vehicle safety performance
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Calibration, Computer Simulation, Humans, Microscopy, Models, Theoretical, Ontario, Safety, Models, Statistical, Motor Vehicles

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review