The use of adaptation to reduce simulator sickness in driving assessment and research
Abstract
The technical advancement of driving simulators has decreased their cost and increased both their accuracy and fidelity. This makes them a useful tool for examining driving behavior in risky or unique situations. With the approaching increase of older licensed drivers due to aging of the baby boomers, driving simulators will be important for conducting driving research and evaluations for older adults. With these simulator technologies, some people may experience significant effects of a unique form of motion sickness, known as simulator sickness. These effects may be more pronounced in older adults. The present study examined the feasibility of an intervention to attenuate symptoms of simulator sickness in drivers participating in a study of a driving evaluation protocol. Prior to beginning the experiment, the experimental groups did not differ in subjective simulator sickness scores as indicated by Revised Simulator Sickness Questionnaire scores (all p>0.5). Participants who experienced a two-day delay between an initial acclimation to the driving simulator and the driving session experienced fewer simulator sickness symptoms as indicated by RSSQ total severity scores than participants who did not receive a two-day delay (F(1,88)=4.54, p=.036, partial η(2)=.049). These findings have implications for improving client well-being and potentially increasing acceptance of driving simulation for driving evaluations and for driving safety research.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A well-designed training protocol can be effective in reducing VIMS.
“The results by Domeyer et al. (2013) show that a well-designed training protocol can be effective in reducing VIMS.”
From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Domeyer et al., 2013
In Domeyer et al. (2013), the group with a delay of at least 24 h between the acclimation session and the driving test reported significantly less VIMS compared to the group who immediately completed the driving test following the first acclimation session.
“Results showed that the group with a delay of at least 24 h between the acclimation session and the driving test reported significantly less VIMS compared to the group who immediately completed the driving test following the first acclimation session.”
From Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related? (2015) · cites this paper as Domeyer et al., 2013
Cites
Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness
Kennedy, R. S., Lane, N. E., Berbaum, K. S., & Lilienthal, M. G. (1993) · The International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3 · Cited by 5,457 · see citing works
Motion Sickness Adaptation: A Neural Mismatch Model
Reason, J. T. (1978) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107687807101109 · Cited by 932 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vection and visually induced motion sickness: how are they related?
Keshavarz, B., Riecke, B. E., Hettinger, L. J., & Campos, J. L. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00472 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
“However, note that an extended training protocol as proposed by Domeyer et al. (2013) can be highly time-consuming and cost-intensive and therefore is rarely practical in many laboratories.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
- Authors
- Domeyer, J. E., Cassavaugh, N. D., & Backs, R. W.
- Affiliations
- Central Michigan University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Cassavaugh, Nicholas D.
- ORCID
- Domeyer, Joshua E.
- Venue
- Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 53
- Pages
- 127-132
- ISSN
- 0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1997998434
- Cited by
- 103
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Central Michigan University Vision 2010
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Simulation and Modeling Applications
- Keywords
- simulator sickness, driving simulator, acclimation, older drivers, driving assessment, motion sickness
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Automobile Driving, Computer Simulation, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motion Sickness, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Time Factors, Young Adult, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review