Using Bayesian networks to analyze occupational stress caused by work demands: Preventing stress through social support
Abstract
Occupational stress is a major health hazard and a serious challenge to the effective operation of any company and represents a major problem for both individuals and organizations. Previous researches have shown that high demands (e.g. workload, emotional) combined with low resources (e.g. support, control, rewards) are associated with adverse health (e.g. psychological, physical) and organizational impacts (e.g. reduced job satisfaction, sickness absence). The objective of the present work is to create a model to analyze how social support reduces the occupational stress caused by work demands. This study used existing Spanish national data on working conditions collected by the Spanish Ministry of Labour and Immigration in 2007, where 11,054 workers were interviewed by questionnaire. A probabilistic model was built using Bayesian networks to explain the relationships between work demands and occupational stress. The model also explains how social support contributes positively to reducing stress levels. The variables studied were intellectually demanding work, overwork, workday, stress, and social support. The results show the importance of social support and of receiving help from supervisors and co-workers in preventing occupational stress. The study provides a new methodology that explains and quantifies the effects of intellectually demanding work, overwork, and workday in occupational stress. Also, the study quantifies the importance of social support to reduce occupational stress.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prior evidence indicates that employees' perceptions of being valued directly impact their workplace orientation, performance, and well-being.
“Indeed, the current results are consistent with prior evidence that employees’ perceptions of being valued directly impact their workplace orientation, performance, and well-being [75,76,77,78,79].”
From Assessing the Relative Impact of Diverse Stressors among Public Safety Personnel (2020) · cites this paper as [76]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 68 · Cited by 62
- Authors
- García-Herrero, S., Mariscal, M. A., Gutiérrez, J. M., & Ritzel, D. O.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de Burgos (ES)
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
- Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ritzel, Dale O.
- ORCID
- Gutiérrez, J.M.
- Venue
- Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 57
- Pages
- 114-123
- ISSN
- 0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1998993035
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 6.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- erratum (2013-10-01)
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces
- Keywords
- occupational stress, job demands, social support, Bayesian networks, overwork, Workday, supervisor support, coworker support, working conditions, stress prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Bayes Theorem, Female, Humans, Job Satisfaction, Male, Occupational Diseases, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Social Support, Spain, Stress, Psychological, Occupational Health, Workload
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review