Cited by 93Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness Research

Short and long sleep duration and risk of drowsy driving and the role of subjective sleep insufficiency

Open access
Maia, Querino, Grandner, Michael A., Findley, James, Gurubhagavatula, Indira·2013·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

Experimental sleep restriction increases sleepiness and impairs driving performance. However, it is unclear whether short sleep duration in the general population is associated with drowsy driving. The goal of the present study was to evaluate whether individuals in the general population who obtained sleep of 6h or less are more likely to report drowsy driving, and evaluate the role of perceived sleep sufficiency. Data exploring whether subgroups of short sleepers (those who report the most or least unmet sleep need) show different risk profiles for drowsy driving are limited. From the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (N=31,522), we obtained the following self-reported data: (1) sleep duration (≤5, 6, 7, 8, 9, or ≥10 h/night); (2) number of days/week of perceived insufficient sleep; (3) among drivers, yes/no response to: "During the past 30 days, have you ever nodded off or fallen asleep, even just for a brief moment, while driving?" (4) demographics, physical/mental health. Using 7 h/night as reference, logistic regression analyses evaluated whether self-reported sleep duration was associated with drowsy driving. Overall, 3.6% reported drowsy driving. Self-identified short-sleepers reported drowsy driving more often, and long sleepers, less often. Among those who perceived sleep as always insufficient, drowsy driving was reported more often when sleep duration was ≤5 h, 6 h, or ≥10 h. Among those who perceived sleep as always sufficient, drowsy driving was reported more often among ≤5 h and 6h sleepers. Overall, drowsy driving was common, particularly in self-identified short-sleepers as a whole, as well as subgroups based on sleep insufficiency.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2013.07.028

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Chronic sleep insufficiency has played a role in motor vehicle accidents, industrial disasters, and medical and other occupational errors.

    “Chronic sleep insufficiency has played a role in motor vehicle accidents, industrial disasters, medical and other occupational errors, for instance(41, 42, 47-51).”
  • Population-level data suggest that short sleep duration is an independent risk factor for drowsy driving, even if respondents believe that they are completely well rested.

    “Population-level data suggest that short sleep duration is an independent risk factor for drowsy driving, even if respondents believe that they are completely well rested.97”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [97]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 93

Authors
Maia, Q., Grandner, M. A., Findley, J., & Gurubhagavatula, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Philadelphia VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Grandner, Michael A.
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
59
Pages
618-622
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035352557
Cited by
93
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL110216)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R21ES022931)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024134)
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (R01OH009149)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
drowsy driving, sleep duration, short sleepers, long sleepers, sleep restriction, sleepiness, driving performance, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Adult, Aged, Automobile Driving, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Sleep Deprivation, Sleep Stages, Time Factors, United States, Logistic Models, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review