The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A feature learning approach based on XGBoost for driving assessment and risk prediction
Abstract
This study designs a framework of feature extraction and selection, to assess vehicle driving and predict risk levels. The framework integrates learning-based feature selection, unsupervised risk rating, and imbalanced data resampling. For each vehicle, about 1300 driving behaviour features are extracted from trajectory data, which produce in-depth and multi-view measures on behaviours. To estimate the risk potentials of vehicles in driving, unsupervised data labelling is proposed. Based on extracted risk indicator features, vehicles are clustered into various groups labelled with graded risk levels. Data under-sampling of the safe group is performed to reduce the risk-safe class imbalance. Afterwards, the linkages between behaviour features and corresponding risk levels are built using XGBoost, and key features are identified according to feature importance ranking and recursive elimination. The risk levels of vehicles in driving are predicted based on key features selected. As a case study, NGSIM trajectory data are used in which four risk levels are clustered by Fuzzy C-means, 64 key behaviour features are identified, and an overall accuracy of 89% is achieved for behaviour-based risk prediction. Findings show that this approach is effective and reliable to identify important features for driving assessment, and achieve an accurate prediction of risk levels.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines
Guyon, I., Weston, J., Barnhill, S., & Vapnik, V. (2002) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1012487302797 · Cited by 9,954
An introduction to variable and feature selection
GuyonIsabelle, & ElisseeffAndré (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944968 · Cited by 7,715
XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting System
Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.02754 · Cited by 7,104
An Introduction to Variable and Feature Selection.
Guyon, I., & Elisseeff, A. (2003) · Cited by 6,576
A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data
Batista, G. E. A. P. A., Prati, R. C., & Monard, M. C. (2004) · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · doi:10.1145/1007730.1007735 · Cited by 4,203
Essentials of the self-organizing map
Kohonen, T. (2013) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2012.09.018 · Cited by 1,601
López, V., Fernández, A., García, S., Palade, V., & Herrera, F. (2013) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.07.007 · Cited by 1,590
Unobserved heterogeneity and the statistical analysis of highway accident data
Mannering, F., Shankar, V. N., & Bhat, C. R. (2016) · Analytic Methods in Accident Research · doi:10.1016/j.amar.2016.04.001 · Cited by 1,344
Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment
Minderhoud, M. M., & Bovy, P. H. L. (2001) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(00)00019-1 · Cited by 954
Cited by
Real-time crash risk prediction on arterials based on LSTM-CNN
Li, P., Abdel-Aty, M., & Yuan, J. (2020) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2019.105371 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Shi, X., Wong, Y. D., Li, M. Z.-F., Palanisamy, C., & Chai, C.
- Venue
- Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-08
- Volume
- 129
- Pages
- 170-179
- ISSN
- 0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2947666609
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 23
- FWCI
- 29.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A feature learning approach based on XGBoost for driving assessment and risk prediction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.005
- The paper
- Shi, X., Wong, Y. D., Li, M. Z.-F., Palanisamy, C., & Chai, C. (2019). A feature learning approach based on XGBoost for driving assessment and risk prediction. Accident Analysis & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.05.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.