Cited by 37Traffic and Road SafetyTraffic control and managementHuman-Automation Interaction and Safety

Identification of safety benefits by inter-vehicle crash risk analysis using connected vehicle systems data on Korean freeways

Jang, Jiyong, Ko, Jieun, Park, Jiwon, Oh, Cheol, Kim, Seoungbum·2020·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

Worldwide efforts have been made to deploy connected vehicle (CV) technologies in practice. The Korean government has also conducted various projects to fully exploit the benefits of CVs. This study attempted to estimate the safety benefits achievable of CVs based on crash risk analyses, which is a part of a pre-deployment project for CVs on freeways. A nice feature of the CVs in this project is that they are equipped with in-vehicle forward collision warning systems that are capable of providing both the speed of a preceding vehicle and the spacing between the preceding vehicle and a subject vehicle. This technical support enables us to systematically analyze vehicle interactions in terms of traffic safety. The crash potential index (CPI), which is able to analyze vehicle interactions in terms of crash risks, was adopted to quantify the crash potential of CVs when the forward hazardous situation warning (FHSW) information was either provided or not provided. The results of this study show that the average speed decreased by 10.2 % and the time-to-collision (TTC) increased by 5.3 % when warning information was provided. In addition, the achievable reduction in the CPI was approximately 20.7 % due to the provision of warning information. An illustrative demonstration of identifying freeway hazardous spots was also presented as a further application of the CPI analysis. The outcomes of this study will be useful for the establishment of relevant policies to promote CV technologi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105675

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jang, J., Ko, J., Park, J., Oh, C., & Kim, S.
Affiliations
  • Hanyang University (KR)
  • Gyeongsang National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Oh, Cheol
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
144
Pages
105675
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3039829011
Cited by
37
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport (20TLRP-B148659-03)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Keywords
connected vehicles, forward collision warning, time-to-collision, inter-vehicle distance, freeway safety, speed reduction
MeSH terms
Accidents, Traffic, Built Environment, Automobiles, Humans, Man-Machine Systems, Risk Assessment, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review