Analysis of pre-crash scenarios and contributing factors for autonomous vehicle crashes at intersections
Abstract
Intersections are high-risk locations for autonomous vehicles (AVs). Crash causation analysis based on pre-crash scenarios can provide new insight into these crashes that can lead to effective countermeasures, but there are significant differences in pre-crash scenarios between autonomous and conventional vehicles, and inadequate AV data has put limits on research. The association rule method, however, can yield useful results despite these limits. This study therefore aims to use the method with pre-crash scenarios to understand the characteristics and contributing factors of AV crashes at intersections from the latest 5-year AV crash data. Analysis of 197 AV crashes at intersections revealed 30 types of pre-crash scenarios. The rear-end crash (58.88%) and lane change crash (16.24%) were the most frequently occurring scenarios for AVs. The proportion of AVs being rear-ended by conventional vehicles was 58.38%. The main contributing factors of these two most common AV scenarios were identified by association rules and crash causes were analyzed from the perspective of AV decision-making. The main factors contributing to the AV rear-end scenario were location outside the intersection in the intersection-related area, traffic signal control, autonomous engaged mode, mixed-use or public land, and weekdays, while those for lane change scenarios were on-street parking and the time of 8:00 a.m. Important causes of rear-end crashes attributable to the AV were inadequate stop and dec…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The number of accidents by road type is higher on urban roads than on freeways.
“The California AV-related accident report shows that the number of accidents by road type is higher on urban roads than on freeways [14].”
From Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Safety by Operational Design Domains (ODD) in Mixed Traffic (2024) · cites this paper as [14]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 74
- Authors
- Liu, Q., Wang, X., Liu, S., Yu, C., & Glaser, Y.
- Affiliations
- Tongji University (CN)
- General Motors (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Xuesong
- Venue
- Accident Analysis & Prevention
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-02
- Volume
- 195
- Pages
- 107383
- ISSN
- 0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388793431
- Cited by
- 74
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 14
- FWCI
- 12.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2021YFF0602700)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality › Traffic and Road Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, intersection crashes, pre-crash scenarios, rear-end collisions, crash contributing factors, collision avoidance, operational design domain, association rule mining, traffic signal control
- MeSH terms
- Accidents, Traffic, Autonomous Vehicles, Automobile Driving, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review