Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 239

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An in vitro and in vivo investigation of the effects of diesel exhaust on human airway lining fluid antioxidants

Open access
Mudway, Ian S, Stenfors, Nikolai, Duggan, Sean T, Roxborough, Heather, Zielinski, Hendrick, Marklund, Stephan L, Blomberg, Anders, Frew, Anthony J, Sandström, Thomas, Kelly, Frank J·2004·Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Abstract

Breathing high concentrations of diesel exhaust (DE) induces pulmonary inflammation, bronchoconstriction, increased airway reactivity, and oxidative stress in healthy subjects. To examine if these responses occur at environmentally relevant concentrations of DE, we exposed 25 healthy subjects to DE (PM(10) 100 microg/m(3), 0.6 ppm NO(2) for 2-h) and filtered air on separate occasions. Immediately following DE exposure, subjects displayed an increase in subjective symptoms and a mild bronchoconstriction. Six hours following the cessation of DE exposure neither airway inflammation, nor antioxidant depletion (ascorbate, urate, and reduced glutathione), was seen at any level of the respiratory tract. Instead, an increased flux of reduced glutathione into the bronchial (p < 0.01) and nasal airways (p < 0.05) was observed. In separate, in vitro experiments, DE was found to have comparable oxidative activity to the transition metal rich residual oil fly ash (ROFA) particle, significantly depleting lung lining fluid ascorbic acid and reduced glutathione in a transition metal and superoxide-dependent mechanism. Together, these data indicate that even though DE has marked oxidative activity, this effect is not observed to any great extent in the airways of healthy subjects. We interpret these findings as being indicative that the antioxidant network at the air-lung interface in healthy subjects is capable of dealing with the oxidative challenge posed by DE at ambient concentrations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.abb.2003.12.018

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 239

Metadata

Authors
Mudway, I. S., Stenfors, N., Duggan, S. T., Roxborough, H., Zielinski, H., Marklund, S. L., Blomberg, A., Frew, A. J., Sandström, T., & Kelly, F. J.
Venue
Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-03
Volume
423
Issue
1
Pages
200-212
ISSN
0003-9861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141321362
Cited by
239
References
4
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An in vitro and in vivo investigation of the effects of diesel exhaust on human airway lining fluid antioxidants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.abb.2003.12.018
The paper
Mudway, I. S., Stenfors, N., Duggan, S. T., Roxborough, H., Zielinski, H., Marklund, S. L., Blomberg, A., Frew, A. J., Sandström, T., & Kelly, F. J. (2004). An in vitro and in vivo investigation of the effects of diesel exhaust on human airway lining fluid antioxidants. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2003.12.018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.