Detection and identification of 20-hydroxyecdysone metabolites in calf urine by liquid chromatography-high resolution or tandem mass spectrometry measurements and establishment of their kinetics of elimination after 20-hydroxyecdysone administration
Abstract
Ecdysteroids, which are steroid hormones in invertebrates, but are also present in plants, could be potentially used as anabolic agents in food-producing animals because of their growth-promoting properties. In this context, the metabolism of 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E) has been investigated in cattle in order to efficiently control its potential misuse. The analytical procedure involves purification on two solid-phase extraction cartridges (SPE octadecylsilyl and SPE silica) prior to detection based on liquid chromatography coupled to high resolution mass spectrometry in negative electrospray ionization mode (LC-(ESI-)-HRMS). Each new signal appearing on full-scan HRMS (30,000) during the analysis was investigated by tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). Comparison of the mass spectra pattern between 20E and potential metabolites has given informations on the chemical structures of the metabolites. This targeted approach, combining HRMS and MS(n) measurements on a linear trap in tandem with an orbital trap, allowed us to elucidate the structure of several 20E metabolites in calf urine: 14-deoxy-20-hydroxyecdysone, 20,26-dihydroxyecdysone and 14-deoxy-20,26-dihydroxyecdysone, the last of which had never previously been reported in bovine. The kinetics of elimination of these metabolites were investigated, and two of them were monitored by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) measurements over 6 days after 20E administration to calves, thus increasing the time-window for detection after 20E administration and thereby allowing for more efficient control of its misuse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The breakdown of ecdysterone differs considerably between species, generating different metabolites.
“The breakdown of ecdysterone differs considerably between species, generating different metabolites.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 13 · Cited by 33
- Authors
- Destrez, B., Pinel, G., Monteau, F., Lafont, R., & Le Bizec, B.
- Affiliations
- Laboratoire D'étude des Résidus et Contaminants Dans les Aliments (FR)
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- ORCID
- Lafont, René
- Venue
- Analytica Chimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 637
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 178-184
- ISSN
- 0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029393693
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Analytica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Pharmacological Effects and Assays
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Doping in Sports
- Keywords
- 20-hydroxyecdysone, ecdysteroids, cattle, metabolite identification, elimination kinetics, anabolic agents, food-producing animals, solid-phase extraction, LC-MS/MS
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Animals, Cattle, Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Ecdysterone, Kinetics, Male, Substance Abuse Detection, Anabolic Agents, Solid Phase Extraction, Tandem Mass Spectrometry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review