Cited by 53Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchAnalytical chemistry methods developmentFluorine in Organic Chemistry

An integrated method for simultaneously determining 10 classes of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances in one drop of human serum

Open access
Gao, Ke, Fu, Jianjie, Xue, Qiao, Li, Yili, Liang, Yong, Pan, Yuanyuan, Zhang, Aiqian, Jiang, Guibin·2018·Analytica Chimica Acta

Abstract

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) represent a group of synthetic chemicals, and they have quite different physicochemical properties, which result in difficulties of their simultaneous determination in a single injection. A sensitive, reliable, and fully automated method was developed for simultaneously detecting 10 classes of PFASs (total of 43) in human serum using online Turboflow SPE-UHPLC-MS/MS. This method provided high linearity of matrix-matched calibration standards (R > 0.99), excellent method limits of detection (MLODs) (0.013-0.089 ng mL-1), satisfactory matrix spiked recoveries (84.3-109%) and relative standard deviations (RSDs) (intra-day RSDs: 1.3-12.6%, inter-day RSDs: 1.7-13.8%, inter-week RSDs: 1.8-13.5%, inter-month RSDs: 3.1-12.4%), short analysis time (19 min per sample) and small sample amount requirement (25 μL), which were suitable for large-scale epidemiologic studies. Moreover, the method provided the feasibility of real-time monitoring for the degradation kinetics of PFASs precursors both in vitro and in vivo. The quality of the present method was further verified by repetitive analysis of a standard reference material (SRM 1957), with the deviations of the targeted PFAS concentrations ranging from 1.9% to 14.2% (n = 5) between the detected and reference values. The present study also determined values for several PFASs in SRM 1957 other than those on the certificate, for the first time, such as N-EtFOSA, 6:2 Cl-PFESA, and PFBA. Finally, the established method was applied to detect PFASs in serum samples of 15 ordinary people and 15 occupational workers, and 6:2 FTSA was found as the dominant precursor.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aca.2017.10.038

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 42 · Cited by 53

Authors
Gao, K., Fu, J., Xue, Q., Li, Y., Liang, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, A., & Jiang, G.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Jianghan University (CN)
  • Thermo Fisher Scientific (China) (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Fu, Jianjie
  • Zhang, Aiqian
Venue
Analytica Chimica Acta
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
999
Pages
76-86
ISSN
0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768046465
Cited by
53
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Analytica Chimica Acta (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDB14030500)
  • National Science Foundation of China (21477154, 21677168, 21621064)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Fluorine in Organic Chemistry
Keywords
per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, PFAS, human serum, simultaneous determination, on-line solid-phase extraction, UPLC-MS/MS, PFAS precursors, degradation kinetics, PFAS exposure, occupational workers, perfluorobutanoic acid
MeSH terms
Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid, Environmental Exposure, Environmental Pollutants, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Sample Size, Solid Phase Extraction, Tandem Mass Spectrometry, Limit of Detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review